Quote from: MadassAlex on Feb 06, 2010, 03:30:08 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Feb 06, 2010, 03:27:09 AM
The game only got two reviews so far IIRC. The game is not out until another week or two. I love the predator was too stealthy part since Preds always been based on stealth. He must know nothing about the series.
This is made even more pathetic by how he uses the example of the original movies as masterpieces when it seems like he's either never seen them (and therefore can't use them as a basis for comparison) or didn't understand a thing about them.
THANK YOU!!! It seems they gave the sports guy this review. Here is the points I have found in the poor review
Predator is stealthy(obviosuly never watched predator 1 = fail)
linear design (hey tardfrick not everything is going to be open world. I seems to remember you praising cod's linear design)
Alien climbing on walls (wtf is this bs)
motion sickness(well..its common that its not usually seen in gaming)
flashlight not being usefull enough (ZOMG, really! So you want the game to kiss your @#% every second)
Motion tracker is annoying (Who the @#$% did they give this review to? Solja boy? Probably didn't realise there is flares)
Multiplayer doesn't feel fresh (okay, well its obviously he didn't botherp laying past deathmatch. In what other game can you play as a pred or alien
My conclusion on this review and/or reviewer is they hated that avp tryed something new. IT didn't follow the standard spf shooter medium. Because of this we have a biased reviewers with a 8 pound waterhead. And half a stick of bs up his @#@$%. I would expect more froma professional reviewer. Opinions are opinions. However, even with eveyrones opinion they have to be well thought out...especially for a journalist. Nothing was well thought out here..not even the wording.
I will buy this still and I hope its as good as the actual avp community is making it out to be. If the avp community enjoys it then I should as well.