Quote from: PortugueseXeno on Jan 04, 2024, 07:16:36 PMQuote from: Acid_Reign161 on Jan 04, 2024, 07:09:33 PMQuote from: PortugueseXeno on Jan 04, 2024, 06:52:37 PMQuote from: Acid_Reign161 on Jan 04, 2024, 06:24:07 PMQuote from: Mike's Monsters on Jan 03, 2024, 11:27:35 PMIt's a blessing and a curse. I still haven't seen the whole thing yet, but I saw pre-CGI stuff and part of me wishes I'd just been able to see the final product for that to be my first experience. But it's also interesting seeing it come together bit by bit.
Ok, without giving away anything, based on what you saw, where would you rank Romulus against the other Alien movies? 😃
Damn, you are going right for the jugular.
I don't want to speak over Mike or something, but in case he doesn't respond quickly or is busy, i'll just tell you what he wrote in some previous comments.
He isn't the biggest fan of the prequels and Romulus seems to capture the feel of Alien, Aliens (and Alien Isolation), so unless he is an Alien 3 fan, he will probably put Romulus as his 3rd... unless, it's crazy good and is somehow a better movie than Aliens.
He probably won't give you any spoilers though.
That's good enough for me 😁👍
I mean I know opinions are subjective (for example I rank Alien 3 very highly and I'm aware I'm in the (awesome 😎) minority here; but hearing from someone who has seen parts of it who is passionate about the first two movies, and feels it could potentially sit alongside the first two movies is a win in my view!
What say you Mike? In your opinion, potential to beat Alien or Aliens when finished? Or a comfortable 3rd place in your book? 😃
I also love Alien 3 (Assembly Cut, although i would have prefer the dog instead of the ox, since seeing the dog get chestbursted is way more impactful), and i do think that Alien 3 seems to be making some sort of a comeback.
I wasn't born when Alien 3 came out, but when i did see it, i loved it.
Now, Aliens, which i think is the perfect scifi-action movie, is an incredible piece of filmmaking.
Cameron and his crew put in the work in order to expand upon what we saw in the first movie, by introducing Weyland-Yutani, the colonies, the marines and all of the future-tech, not to mention what they did for the future of animatronics and practical effects.
Also, he gave an incredible arc for Ripley.
But part of me feels like he stole some of the more alien parts of the alien and made it more relatable as some sort of space ant/bee.
I don't mind the existence of Queens, but i simply don't want it to be the end of all and be all of the Xeno cycle, but merely one of the manhy ways that it adapts to the universe and its environments, so hopefully, Romulus puts the alien back in the alien akin to what we saw in the first movie and the eggmorphing deleted scene.
I think Cameron was only following through from what happened in the first movie. That is, continue making W-Y the antagonist. But because audiences already saw the alien, then it was pointless to repeat that. Hence, "aliens" (plural), which would have made it an action movie.
He said in his commentary that he grew up during the Vietnam War, read about colonialism in school, and only a few years before he wrote
Aliens read about companies exploiting the poor in other countries. That's why he decided to use the military in the movie, to reflect what was happening in reality, with the military/government colluding with powerful corporations.
Also, I think Cameron isn't so much interested in making action movies but in telling stories, which is why his favorite movies depict that:
https://www.indiewire.com/gallery/james-cameron-favorite-movies-director-good-reviews-recommendations/inception-from-left-leonardo-dicaprio-ellen-page-2010-ph-melissa-moseley-warner-bros-courtes/and the only way to make this action movie what he wanted was to bring back Ripley's character. There are some interesting points about that here:
http://alienexplorations.blogspot.com/1986/11/aliens-signing-up-weaver.htmlwhich I think revealed that Weaver laughed off a sequel for the first movie, and signed on only because Cameron pretended that without her character he would make a lead played by Arnold Schwarzenegger. In addition, it turns out that Weaver is liberal such that she prefers storytelling and dislikes guns. Later, Cameron would say similar things by cutting away scenes from his second
Avatar movie because he doesn't want gun violence "fetishized":
https://ew.com/movies/james-cameron-cut-10-minutes-of-gun-violence-avatar-2/This might explain why the main action in
Aliens takes place after something like half of the movie is shown. That means much of the movie is actually character development, exposition, etc.
About the hive, it looks like it made sense that if there are things like eggs and multiple aliens, then the creature was like a bee, which would mean some queen laying eggs. Also, the queen alien would serve as another counter to Ripley's character, which is also a mother trying to protect Newt.
From there, one can also see what happened in the third and fourth movies, with the third that was supposed to end Ripley's story and the fourth which I think started expanding the franchise in various directions but didn't succeed storywise.
I think that plus the prequels is what hemmed producers in, which is why the new movie and TV show are set within or before the four movies, with the new movie looking like a spinoff involving thieves and aliens (it's like that recent movie about thieves and zombies) and the TV show about not just the alien but also AI, technology, etc. (because with TV shows one has to move in various directions in order to show more episodes).