Started by War Wager, Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:03:11 PMHow could it be fact if it is only believed? Human would be considered small prey and I'm sure it would have no problem taking you out. Me on the other hand...Do you have a pic of what the Dilo was believed to look like?
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 04:23:54 PMIt's believed Dilophosaurus couldn't hunt large prey b/c again, due to its weak jaws, it wouldn't be able to pin down and properly subdue struggling prey.
Quote from: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:55:20 PMThat actually does make sense. I always wondered why he had a hard time moving around after they attacked him. As for the Dilo, didn't they get the idea of it spitting venom because of its bite?
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 10:28:11 PMUmmm...that's not how it is explained in the book or movie, but it works.
Quote from: Zero on Mar 12, 2008, 10:40:46 PMQuote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 10:28:11 PMUmmm...that's not how it is explained in the book or movie, but it works.I never read the bookThe movie does not stateThis information came from a game,so It may not be true. JP:OG Dino Encyclopedia
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2008, 03:18:28 PMQuote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 11, 2008, 11:46:51 AMQuote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PMQuote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AMYea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok gamei agree,i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.honestly, t-rex looked great cause he was the largest carnivore there compared to the velociraptor, but t-rex still wouldnt have had that size difference compared to a real sized dilphosaurus, ps. i never said dilophosaurus was as big as a t-rex.I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 11, 2008, 11:46:51 AMQuote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PMQuote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AMYea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok gamei agree,i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.honestly, t-rex looked great cause he was the largest carnivore there compared to the velociraptor, but t-rex still wouldnt have had that size difference compared to a real sized dilphosaurus, ps. i never said dilophosaurus was as big as a t-rex.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PMQuote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AMYea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok gamei agree,i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AMYea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok gamei agree,i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AMYea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2008, 01:37:35 AM^^ Very unlikely given the size of the crests. A juvenile's head crests wouldn't be so developed.