Jurassic Park Series

Started by War Wager, Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM

Author
Jurassic Park Series (Read 1,366,875 times)

Gate

Gate

#12765
You have no recollection of someone forgetting something.


Someone kill me before I make more puns about this.

KiramidHead

KiramidHead

#12766
Quote from: Gate on Jan 09, 2016, 04:55:27 PM
You have no recollection of someone forgetting something.


Someone kill me before I make more puns about this.

You see, I've got this condition...

Alien³

Alien³

#12767
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dJolYw8tnk
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
...to forget.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

whiterabbit

whiterabbit

#12768
The power to cheat memories is a power that only one has achieved and you know what; Superman is never around when you really need him.

Alien³

Alien³

#12769
"We're not ready."

whiterabbit

whiterabbit

#12770
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 10, 2016, 04:10:28 AM
"We're not ready."
You're never ready. You go when you're ready enough. So pucker up.


HuDaFuK

HuDaFuK

#12771
Man, I love me some Robot Chicken. Such a demented show.

DoomRulz

DoomRulz

#12772
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]

whiterabbit

whiterabbit

#12773
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

FiorinaFury161

FiorinaFury161

#12774
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
[close]

DoomRulz

DoomRulz

#12775
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]

whiterabbit

whiterabbit

#12776
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]
Spoiler
If you can find dino dna; you can find any other dna you want. Talking movie logic right? The second part, people in Jurassic World  were already bored of dinos, "apparently", which is why they had to engineer more fearsome monsters. Putting them out into the wild doesn't change that. In all honesty though, something would have to be done with the dinos.

I get the idea of hunters wanting trophies and humans hunting them to extinction but the justification to set them free on the world isn't very logical. Still what to do with them... none the less they are here and they'll be people that want to take care of them. I still see selling them to outside interest as a way of integrating them into the real world more logically than letting them loose for speculative reasons. Thinking that they would help the "eco system" just sounds so Prometheus™ school of science. No offense.

The thing about the plants could be made to work. Perhaps as you say, introducing a dinosaur to a rain forest caused plants to evolve in a different manner that allow for the production of new chemicals used for defense that have medical applications. Some of that was in Jurassic park with that plant the triceratops was eating. This would be stretching it though.
[close]

Godzillakuj94

Godzillakuj94

#12777
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 06:18:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]
Spoiler
If you can find dino dna; you can find any other dna you want. Talking movie logic right? The second part, people in Jurassic World  were already bored of dinos, "apparently", which is why they had to engineer more fearsome monsters. Putting them out into the wild doesn't change that. In all honesty though, something would have to be done with the dinos.

I get the idea of hunters wanting trophies and humans hunting them to extinction but the justification to set them free on the world isn't very logical. Still what to do with them... none the less they are here and they'll be people that want to take care of them. I still see selling them to outside interest as a way of integrating them into the real world more logically than letting them loose for speculative reasons. Thinking that they would help the "eco system" just sounds so Prometheus™ school of science. No offense.

The thing about the plants could be made to work. Perhaps as you say, introducing a dinosaur to a rain forest caused plants to evolve in a different manner that allow for the production of new chemicals used for defense that have medical applications. Some of that was in Jurassic park with that plant the triceratops was eating. This would be stretching it though.
[close]
Spoiler
Maybe they escape from wherever they took Wu?
[close]

whiterabbit

whiterabbit

#12778
Ok how about this...

Spoiler
It's not the dinos that get out but the plants. Flying dinosaurs do escape after the 3rd movie so if anything they carried what are essentially alien plant seeds to new areas. The plants themselves spread as well. Which does cause a global pandemic of sorts. To counter this some countries decide to use a biological means of control and do indeed release herbivore dinosaurs into the wild. It works well enough that soon everyone is doing it but like anything, eventually they're too many dinos and hippies. No one can come up with a solution so somebody decides to take matters into their own hands and release a few meat eaters. Of course the ones they release out of ignorance are the super intelligent militaristic killing machines. Of course now every hunter in the world wants to bag a prize and governments are more than willing to pay for a non-military solution.

yea yea it's the some more of the hippies release the big bad virus and rednecks release the big bad virus and I'm not sure if 3 years is enough time to justify this shit as the movie is suppose to happen in real time. Still I feel the biological control concept has a little more reasoning to it.
[close]

DoomRulz

DoomRulz

#12779
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 09:11:29 PM
Ok how about this...

Spoiler
It's not the dinos that get out but the plants. Flying dinosaurs do escape after the 3rd movie so if anything they carried what are essentially alien plant seeds to new areas. The plants themselves spread as well. Which does cause a global pandemic of sorts. To counter this some countries decide to use a biological means of control and do indeed release herbivore dinosaurs into the wild. It works well enough that soon everyone is doing it but like anything, eventually they're too many dinos and hippies. No one can come up with a solution so somebody decides to take matters into their own hands and release a few meat eaters. Of course the ones they release out of ignorance are the super intelligent militaristic killing machines. Of course now every hunter in the world wants to bag a prize and governments are more than willing to pay for a non-military solution.

yea yea it's the some more of the hippies release the big bad virus and rednecks release the big bad virus and I'm not sure if 3 years is enough time to justify this shit as the movie is suppose to happen in real time. Still I feel the biological control concept has a little more reasoning to it.
[close]

I hate to be pedantic but...pterosaurs :P

In you scenario, there's no reason why the herbivorous dinosaurs couldn't just be killed by conventional means. It would be more economical than creating and releasing theropods. Also, where did hippies come from?

AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News