Started by War Wager, Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PMThat was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.
Quote from: AvatarIII on Mar 01, 2011, 10:45:14 AMQuote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PMThat was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.i dunno, all life on earth shares a huge amount of DNA, humans and banana's share about 50% apparently, the amount of DNA that actually does stuff is only a tiny fraction of our entire DNA code, most of the rest is just random junk or stuff that's been turned off. and if the frog DNA they used was mostly that stuff, just there to pad the chromosomes out basically, the kind of characteristics that they inherited from frogs should have been practically nothing, if the scientists who made the DNA knew what they were doing.
Quote from: Gate on Apr 02, 2011, 05:50:57 AMhttp://www.dailyseagull.com/movie-reviews-from-the-future-jurassic-park-4-summer-2010/Just posted this up for the lulz. This article is so retardedly hilarious that I nearly died laughing.
QuoteOver the past 15 years, Nedry has been producing dinosaurs, and upgrading them to make them even more destructive. Velociraptors will now carry machine guns, Tyrannosaurus Rex's will have bazookas, and Brontosaurus' will shoot grenades out of their necks. There's even a brand new dinosaur called the Terroristosaurus
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 06, 2011, 09:05:48 AMThe people at Universal better get the stick out of their asses and start working on JP4. Hell, even Joe Johnston recently said he'd be interested in directing it after he was done with Captain America.