Seeing first the theatrical cut, then the assembly cut, I naturally thought they changed the host from dog to ox because of the difficulty of that big of a chestburster fitting inside that dog. And I just speculated they maybe did it because they didn't want to show the dog getting destroyed. Silly me, this is Alien 3 we're talking about.
Never knew the change was the other way around and what was the reason for it.
And the dog in the xeno suit was so cute! But I'm glad that wasn't in the final cut.
Quote from: whiterabbit on May 05, 2018, 10:12:51 PM
Well I wasn't being all to serious about it but since we're on it. I think the alien does take a little bit of the host consciousness or knowledge. Especially with black goo dna now in the mix. Before that I would have said no. However an alien has fingers and limbs, and resembles the host to some degree so acclimating the knowledge to use those appendages has to be gained from somewhere. So yea, smarter the creature, more civilized the xenomorph.
I would agree on the smarter the host, smarter the xenomorph part, but civilized? That's a way I'd never describe the alien IMO, though I am getting flashbacks of O'Bannon's original idea for the species.
Yeah, it has been argued that the dog alien was more vicious, aggressive, lacking tactical thinking than other xenomorphs. So could that mean if they impregnated a greatly more intelligent species than ourselves and one that is incredibly pacifistic, that you could basically sit next to a very intelligent and calm alien?
Just speculating... We now know that David made the alien specifically for humans and for them to kill us, but I'm wondering if aggression varies from host species, could that aggression be bred out of them basically?