Quote from: SiL on Apr 04, 2017, 12:17:08 PM
I'm not saying you're lying, at all. But if you can't back up what you're saying, then who cares what you have to say about the material?
Evidently someone else in this thread. If you don't, that's fine.
QuoteI know I'm sounding like a dick, but damn does it get tiring after a decade or so.
You're not the only one who's been on the Internet or geek forums for a long time. We take the occupational hazards of life as we can. Or not.
Quote from: von on Apr 04, 2017, 12:15:51 PM
Ultimately, I believe it will help more than it will hurt the franchise. I really just don't want it to go in the way of ID: Resurgence
I think some people may see the film that way, because nothing is ever good or bad anymore, it's always 'the best' or 'the worst'. I think it's going to bitterly polarize geeks and perhaps the Internet in the style of the films I mention. (Unlike the final production of
Prometheus however, I think this story's ideas and mythology are very much solidified and sure of themselves and their aims, whereas I'm not sure Scott or Lindelof were comfortable committing to anything concrete either in pre, production or post, from design to script to cutting.) Or who knows, maybe most people will embrace it. I think it will do well financially, but I worry the studio will balk at the fanboy reaction and want to roll back to something more conventional and safe. I do think the changes in the overall mythos are one of the only ways to progress the franchise beyond another dreadful AVP film or 'Predators come here to hunt people, possibly in the closest and cheapest national park location we find'.