Pacific Rim films

Started by Ratchetcomand, Mar 08, 2011, 04:29:31 AM

Did You Enjoy "Pacific Rim Uprising"

Loved It!
8 (19.5%)
It Was Okay
12 (29.3%)
Simply Terrible
21 (51.2%)

Total Members Voted: 41

Author
Pacific Rim films (Read 956,998 times)

Cvalda

Cvalda

#2595
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 12, 2013, 09:23:58 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2013, 09:21:11 PM
Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Yeah cause you can totally make gigant monsters fighting gigant robots without CGI.
I dunno, the term "kaiju" dropped in the trailer to elicit fanboy fapping is a genre that did it without CGI for over 50 years.
And look at what we got...

http://img.pandawhale.com/45155-Godzilla-f**k-this-gif-yoYL.gif
More entertaining.

Vickers

Vickers

#2596
/thread

OmegaZilla

OmegaZilla

#2597
They could do it with other means. There is the possibility to use stop-motion (with added motion blur -- they can do that now!) or go-motion, with the proper digital enhancement.

Or yes, suits.

And the Godzilla movies were all low budgeted; not a good indication, not of what a properly budgeted film would have looked like in their time, nor what it would look like now.

It's all in the craft of the technique. Example:

Yes, the film used a good 75% CGI in the end... but the above shot is Kurt Carley in the 1/24th scale suit. :)


Now don't get me wrong -- I'm not in the 'Pacific Rim CGI is horrendous' boat. I'm just saying that some things can be achieved with other means.

Aspie

Aspie

#2598
Quote from: Vickers on Jun 12, 2013, 09:20:54 PM
Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Yeah cause you can totally make gigant monsters fighting gigant robots without CGI.

Practical effects...

But there are very few giant monster films that are actually good - CGI or not. :P

Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Girls you both full of shit.

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/3274/lolnd.gif

What is that gif from? I must know her name :P

Cvalda

Cvalda

#2599
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 12, 2013, 09:28:41 PM
go-motion
Would be fantastic if that were used today combined with digital compositing.

But then that would require actual imagination on the part of filmmakers and producers.

Vickers

Vickers

#2600
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 09:29:42 PM
Quote from: Vickers on Jun 12, 2013, 09:20:54 PM
Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Yeah cause you can totally make gigant monsters fighting gigant robots without CGI.

Practical effects...

But there are very few giant monster films that are actually good - CGI or not. :P

Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Girls you both full of shit.

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/3274/lolnd.gif

What is that gif from? I must know her name :P

Linda Cardellini from Freaks and Geeks.

ScardyFox

ScardyFox

#2601
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 09:29:42 PM
Quote from: Vickers on Jun 12, 2013, 09:20:54 PM
Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Yeah cause you can totally make gigant monsters fighting gigant robots without CGI.

Practical effects...

But there are very few giant monster films that are actually good - CGI or not. :P

Quote from: Master on Jun 12, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Girls you both full of shit.

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/3274/lolnd.gif

What is that gif from? I must know her name :P

Here FOO'EL

Space Sweeper

Space Sweeper

#2602
suh hawt

Aspie

Aspie

#2603
yeezus

OmegaZilla

OmegaZilla

#2604
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2013, 09:31:52 PM
Would be fantastic if that were used today combined with digital compositing.
Exactly, that's what I am saying. :)

Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2013, 09:31:52 PM
But then that would require actual imagination on the part of filmmakers and producers.
I think the problem here is more due to the time part. CGI is quicker (though in no way easier) and I guess producers will be more willing to spend their money on CGI than these old techniques purely based on the success of other CGI-heavy films.

Del Toro is very imaginative, but he does not have total-total freedom over it I guess. Especially with such a big budget.

ScardyFox

ScardyFox

#2605
Funny enough the first I "noticed" her was in Scooby Doo.

Cvalda

Cvalda

#2606
CGI is definitely not quicker, it take months and months and months of processing.

Go-motion = stick a maquette in front of a blue screen, puppeteer it in real time, then composite it. Fairly straightforward.

It's just that the effects industry, producers -- and of course audiences -- are so lazy and accustomed to the same kind of ugly, instantly dated, grotesquely expensive CGI crap time and time again that that's all anyone thinks to use anymore.

Aspie

Aspie

#2607
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jun 12, 2013, 09:36:40 PM
Funny enough the first I "noticed" her was in Scooby Doo.

O_O

Vickers

Vickers

#2608
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2013, 09:38:16 PM
CGI is definitely not quicker, it take months and months and months of processing.

Go-motion = stick a maquette in front of a blue screen, puppeteer it in real time, then composite it. Fairly straightforward.

It's just that the effects industry, producers -- and of course audiences -- are so lazy and accustomed to the same kind of ugly, instantly dated, grotesquely expensive CGI crap time and time again that that's all anyone thinks to use anymore.

Yup.

ScardyFox

ScardyFox

#2609
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 09:38:34 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jun 12, 2013, 09:36:40 PM
Funny enough the first I "noticed" her was in Scooby Doo.

O_O

She played Velma... however its spelt. In the second one she wears a skin tight leather body suit.

AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News