Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 06, 2023, 04:05:06 AMQuote from: Cougerboy on Dec 06, 2023, 01:30:08 AMQuote from: reecebomb on Dec 05, 2023, 11:36:03 AMQuote from: Cougerboy on Dec 04, 2023, 08:07:01 PMYou need to accept that you do not have a monopoly on interpretation of what is "proper" Godzilla.
Can't argue with that, just sharing my opinion.
Comparing the last two films from both countries, Japan manages still do outdo USA with literally ten times smaller budget. Hollywood should certainly be capable of creating a great Godzilla film but I don't think they are really trying very hard at the moment and still haven't manage to do the character proper justice (2014 was the closest, but no cigar.) Give the character to someone like Matt Reeves, I think Cloverfield is still the best modern Kaiju film.
I do like whacky charm of Showa era films but again if the classic characters are put in modern Western cgi soup, the charm is lost and it's another soulless modern blockbuster.
The monsterverse films are fine, certainly they aren't perfect and got issues. But they seem to understand and found their audience, given the decent returns of GvK in the depth of the pandemic.
Toho offers the alternative of the more traditional scary Godzilla, which is fantastic. We get the best of both worlds, the box office is big enough for different approaches to Godzilla. And that is awesome as a Godzilla fan.
Yep, that's how I feel here. One of the chief primary complaints with the MCU (and a very valid one, IMO) is just how samey it all is. The good stuff, the bad stuff, the middle of the road stuff, pretty much all of it feels like a piece cut from the same pie.
Meanwhile, Godzilla is a franchise that is offering some wildly different takes, different tones, different voices, etc. right now. Pick your flavor, or take it all! There's a little bit for everyone going around under this umbrella in the past decade or so (so much so that even within its splintered subfranchises, you're going to find conflicting installments with wildly different creative intent).
That's the strength of Godzilla as a character, he can be put in different genres and portrayed in many different ways, serious, tragic, funny or silly, and it will all work.
Well...ok, all that said, Godzilla still has to be recognizable as a character with certain "Godzilla attributes", if you move away too far from that, then that character ceases to be "Godzilla" in the true sense. That was the problem with the 1998 Godzilla. As a generic monster movie, the 1998 movie was actually ok. Watchable, but not great. The real issue was that it wasn't a Godzilla movie. The character just wasn't Godzilla. But beyond that particular issue, Godzilla is actually quite flexible as a character.
Quote from: SiL on Dec 06, 2023, 05:31:56 AMI found a lot of stuff between 1963 and 1975 dull and painfully difficult to sit through so I feel like Legendary is sort of par for the course within the franchise.
It's big loud nonsense with terrible characters but the occasional memorable action scene.
Yeah, I get what you mean. But plenty of people, including Godzilla fans, love that. To be fair, Legendary monsterverse also incorporated elements from the Heisei era of the 80's to 90's as well, albeit not as prominent in influence as the Showa era.
Personally, if Legendary decides to feature Jet Jaguar in the Monsterverse, then that will be a stretch too far...even for me. But we'll worry about that only if Legendary ever decides to go down that silliest Showa era stuff.