Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2012, 07:36:27 PMHere it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UXIajUPnMc#
Great piece of music, but the Hanson piece works A LOT better.
Thanks, yes, it sounds great, and I'd apparently prefer Goldsmith's version of closing titles. Hanson's piece sounds opportune at time when Ripley observes Alien withdraw from the shuttle, due to its soothing tone, but Goldsmith's one has something unsettling to it.
Quote from: Valaquen on Mar 03, 2012, 07:21:27 PMI think it's a different ship. The Jockey room platform is different. The prongs aren't as curved as the original.
Don't worry, sarcophagus will grow there later too.
Well, I'm joking, of course, but the likelihood for a ship, which is of half-biological nature to transfigure itself are a way higher, than for an electonic and mechanical vessel to repaint its hull and remodel its chambers
Well, regarding the topic, I reckon, Weylangd's stand-out arrogance was deliberately performed and he has something with a positive key up his sleeves (from the Lindelof's interview):
QuoteGuy Pearce is a brilliant actor — you basically just write the words and let the actor do what they're going to do with the words. And Peter Weyland's role is still a toss-up for the audience. They don't know what he's going to be in the movie, or how this talk relates to the movie. I do think that, if someone is going to be saying the things that this guy is saying, then there is a god complex inherent in the speech. Guy Pearce took that and ran with it, and I feel like that gives it a certain degree of entertaining power.