Quote from: SM on May 29, 2018, 02:35:39 AM
Quote from: The Old One on May 29, 2018, 02:26:35 AM
Quote from: SM on May 29, 2018, 12:39:37 AM
QuoteWe don't need it and never will, the idea has no real potential either. It would be a TFA style regurgitation that ultimately nobody worth their salt would ask for.
There's no need for this crap.
I don't think my comparison is unwarranted.
I have no faith in Neill Blomkamp and to me another sequel starring Ripley 8 or Ellen Ripley would devalue the franchise. No need to call it crap, it's only my opinion.
Even if I am more than a little salty about the idea of alternatives to Alien 3 to begin with & the reason I don't want it to be like modern SW is obvious and pointed out in the second part of my paragraph. Bad but interesting is better than being decent and lacking any identity.
I don't give a shit either way.
TFA was immensely popular. Lots of people would like to see the Blomkamp film. Painting them all as 'not worth their salt' is crap.
Well, sorry but I'll never take back that anyone that wants regurgitation is worth their salt because they are pointedly not, there's nothing worthwhile about clones with no new ideas of their own. No matter how popular. TFA was popular not due to what it did itself, (Aside from actor chemistry) but the immense potential it had as a jumping off point.
A new saga for a new generation.
I maintain my belief Alien doesn't need that and more-so would be actively harmed by it.
Quote from: SiL on May 29, 2018, 02:34:51 AM
Quote from: The Old One on May 29, 2018, 02:26:35 AM
Quote from: SM on May 29, 2018, 12:39:37 AM
QuoteWe don't need it and never will, the idea has no real potential either. It would be a TFA style regurgitation that ultimately nobody worth their salt would ask for.
There's no need for this crap.
I don't think my comparison is unwarranted.
I have no faith in Neill Blomkamp and to me another sequel starring Ripley 8 or Ellen Ripley would devalue the franchise. No need to call it crap, it's only my opinion.
Even if I am more than a little salty about the idea of alternatives to Alien 3 to begin with & the reason I don't want it to be like modern SW is obvious and pointed out in the second part of my paragraph. Bad but interesting is better than being decent and lacking any identity.
He means there's no need for the condescending bullshit of saying people who like TFA and similar projects "aren't worth their salt".
There's nothing wrong with liking TFA, there would have been if it's intention was to replace another SW film with something that contributes nothing new but actor chemistry- but even though it mimicked; it never replaces. That's the red line.