Started by Ingwar, May 07, 2017, 09:46:21 AM
Quote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 04:36:50 PMQuote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 02:08:55 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.I always felt sorry for strauss brothers. I mean they worked hard on that film despite studio restrictions, and to have someone screw up the lighting must have been terrible for them. I always wondered if they could have corrected that would it have been somewhat better??lol, as if the problem with the movie was due to lighting. come on, for real.
Quote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 02:08:55 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.I always felt sorry for strauss brothers. I mean they worked hard on that film despite studio restrictions, and to have someone screw up the lighting must have been terrible for them. I always wondered if they could have corrected that would it have been somewhat better??
Quote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.
Quote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 04:46:31 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 04:36:50 PMQuote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 02:08:55 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.I always felt sorry for strauss brothers. I mean they worked hard on that film despite studio restrictions, and to have someone screw up the lighting must have been terrible for them. I always wondered if they could have corrected that would it have been somewhat better??lol, as if the problem with the movie was due to lighting. come on, for real.Of course not, but that was part of the issue.
Quote from: kwisatz on May 07, 2017, 07:25:58 PMLol Ridley, congratulations for making this film cheap as ++++.
Quote from: Ingwar on May 07, 2017, 07:28:46 PMQuote from: kwisatz on May 07, 2017, 07:25:58 PMLol Ridley, congratulations for making this film cheap as ++++.I don't think that Ridley Scott will read that. Besides, have you seen the movie yet?
Quote from: Ragonk_Force on May 07, 2017, 07:29:50 PMQuote from: Ingwar on May 07, 2017, 07:28:46 PMQuote from: kwisatz on May 07, 2017, 07:25:58 PMLol Ridley, congratulations for making this film cheap as ++++.I don't think that Ridley Scott will read that. Besides, have you seen the movie yet?also shouldnt he be thanking fox?
Quote from: kwisatz on May 07, 2017, 07:37:13 PMWasnt that serious. No doubt Ridley is reading avpg.net though.
Quote from: Anthony on May 07, 2017, 08:05:44 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 04:36:50 PMQuote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 02:08:55 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.I always felt sorry for strauss brothers. I mean they worked hard on that film despite studio restrictions, and to have someone screw up the lighting must have been terrible for them. I always wondered if they could have corrected that would it have been somewhat better??lol, as if the problem with the movie was due to lighting. come on, for real."Hey people are dying. We need guns!"Also don't forget about marketing costs. They spent a decent chunk to advertise it, so I imagine the total cost was $200 Million. And with sharing the revenue with theaters, I'd estimate the break even point is $400 Million.
Quote from: Robopadna on May 07, 2017, 08:10:09 PMQuote from: Anthony on May 07, 2017, 08:05:44 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 04:36:50 PMQuote from: Gigeresque on May 07, 2017, 02:08:55 PMQuote from: cliffhanger on May 07, 2017, 12:55:39 PMyet avp is reminded as shit and avp:r as shit that you just stepped on,and covenant will vastly be remembered as ridley's breakthrough return to the original movie and highly memorable, being right up there with the original and the sequel.I always felt sorry for strauss brothers. I mean they worked hard on that film despite studio restrictions, and to have someone screw up the lighting must have been terrible for them. I always wondered if they could have corrected that would it have been somewhat better??lol, as if the problem with the movie was due to lighting. come on, for real."Hey people are dying. We need guns!"Also don't forget about marketing costs. They spent a decent chunk to advertise it, so I imagine the total cost was $200 Million. And with sharing the revenue with theaters, I'd estimate the break even point is $400 Million.Depending on which market the money is coming from its probably closer to 500 to break even. At least from the box office.