Started by War Wager, Mar 28, 2007, 07:49:40 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 01, 2013, 06:37:21 PMI probably wouldn't say that I like it better, but I have a hard time choosing between one or the other. They are on par with one another to me. The 2005 film has to be one of the greatest remakes I've ever seen. It pays an immense amount of respect to the original, but doesn't waste film by being a shot for shot copy of it.
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 01, 2013, 12:11:17 PMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 08:45:37 AMQuote from: Nightlord on Mar 01, 2013, 08:34:56 AMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:09:47 AMThey may as well have called this, The Lord of the Rings Prequel: The Hobbit. So many boring, irrelevant scenes that have nothing to do with the story. Smaug looked like a cartoon at the end. Peter Jackson, your movies are overblown cgi-fests and they suck. Go back to making zombie movies and movies about sex-crazed, drug addicted muppets. Fellowship of the Ring I kind of enjoyed, but the rest of the series just got too big for its britches.The Hobbit sequel: The Lord of the Rings.... yeah that has a nice ring to it.Different strokes for different folks.What u talkin bout Willis?http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mTuwb3Gonr4/TUJHh6hwqlI/AAAAAAAAAHs/xQn5kz41AP0/s1600/300px-718smiley.svg.pngForced "le meme XDD" reply confirms you're an underage troll or at least have the mindset of one. That came out of nowhere.
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 08:45:37 AMQuote from: Nightlord on Mar 01, 2013, 08:34:56 AMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:09:47 AMThey may as well have called this, The Lord of the Rings Prequel: The Hobbit. So many boring, irrelevant scenes that have nothing to do with the story. Smaug looked like a cartoon at the end. Peter Jackson, your movies are overblown cgi-fests and they suck. Go back to making zombie movies and movies about sex-crazed, drug addicted muppets. Fellowship of the Ring I kind of enjoyed, but the rest of the series just got too big for its britches.The Hobbit sequel: The Lord of the Rings.... yeah that has a nice ring to it.Different strokes for different folks.What u talkin bout Willis?http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mTuwb3Gonr4/TUJHh6hwqlI/AAAAAAAAAHs/xQn5kz41AP0/s1600/300px-718smiley.svg.png
Quote from: Nightlord on Mar 01, 2013, 08:34:56 AMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:09:47 AMThey may as well have called this, The Lord of the Rings Prequel: The Hobbit. So many boring, irrelevant scenes that have nothing to do with the story. Smaug looked like a cartoon at the end. Peter Jackson, your movies are overblown cgi-fests and they suck. Go back to making zombie movies and movies about sex-crazed, drug addicted muppets. Fellowship of the Ring I kind of enjoyed, but the rest of the series just got too big for its britches.The Hobbit sequel: The Lord of the Rings.... yeah that has a nice ring to it.Different strokes for different folks.
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:09:47 AMThey may as well have called this, The Lord of the Rings Prequel: The Hobbit. So many boring, irrelevant scenes that have nothing to do with the story. Smaug looked like a cartoon at the end. Peter Jackson, your movies are overblown cgi-fests and they suck. Go back to making zombie movies and movies about sex-crazed, drug addicted muppets. Fellowship of the Ring I kind of enjoyed, but the rest of the series just got too big for its britches.
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 03, 2013, 04:11:19 AMQuote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 01, 2013, 12:11:17 PMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 08:45:37 AMQuote from: Nightlord on Mar 01, 2013, 08:34:56 AMQuote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:09:47 AMThey may as well have called this, The Lord of the Rings Prequel: The Hobbit. So many boring, irrelevant scenes that have nothing to do with the story. Smaug looked like a cartoon at the end. Peter Jackson, your movies are overblown cgi-fests and they suck. Go back to making zombie movies and movies about sex-crazed, drug addicted muppets. Fellowship of the Ring I kind of enjoyed, but the rest of the series just got too big for its britches.The Hobbit sequel: The Lord of the Rings.... yeah that has a nice ring to it.Different strokes for different folks.What u talkin bout Willis?http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mTuwb3Gonr4/TUJHh6hwqlI/AAAAAAAAAHs/xQn5kz41AP0/s1600/300px-718smiley.svg.pngForced "le meme XDD" reply confirms you're an underage troll or at least have the mindset of one. That came out of nowhere.And your stupid ring pun didn't? lol
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 01, 2013, 06:29:48 PMYeah. I personally think his version is better than the original.
Quote from: Gates on Mar 07, 2013, 01:17:50 AMLook what just came in:And here are the others:I had Hadhafang sharpened, for zombie apocalypse...Now, I can finally hang 'em all up (yes, I'm anal, I needed a second single-edged one so I can set them up proper...lulz)...oh yeah..!
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 07, 2013, 01:20:29 AMWhoa, very nice. Be sure to post pics when you have them up!
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 01, 2013, 06:37:21 PMI probably wouldn't say that I like it better, but I have a hard time choosing between one or the other. They are on par with one another to me. The 2005 film has to be one of the greatest remakes I've ever seen. It pays an immense amount of respect to the original, but doesn't waste film by being a shot for shot copy of it.Good thing there are only two versions of King Kong...right? RIGHT?
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2013, 01:44:22 AMQuote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 01, 2013, 06:37:21 PMI probably wouldn't say that I like it better, but I have a hard time choosing between one or the other. They are on par with one another to me. The 2005 film has to be one of the greatest remakes I've ever seen. It pays an immense amount of respect to the original, but doesn't waste film by being a shot for shot copy of it.Good thing there are only two versions of King Kong...right? RIGHT?Son of Kong is worthy, as is King Kong vs Godzilla and King Kong Escapes. Others...well : /
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 07, 2013, 01:50:07 AMQuote from: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2013, 01:44:22 AMQuote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 01, 2013, 06:37:21 PMI probably wouldn't say that I like it better, but I have a hard time choosing between one or the other. They are on par with one another to me. The 2005 film has to be one of the greatest remakes I've ever seen. It pays an immense amount of respect to the original, but doesn't waste film by being a shot for shot copy of it.Good thing there are only two versions of King Kong...right? RIGHT?Son of Kong is worthy, as is King Kong vs Godzilla and King Kong Escapes. Others...well : /"It's okay, they're all smoking!"Oh, 1960s.Son of Kong is quite good, but not a remake KK vs G, well, its fun for what it is Haven't seen all of KKE.
