Quote from: SiL on Apr 04, 2024, 10:07:39 AMWell, no, canon doesn't require that the rules or list of accepted text are ordained by any specific authority, just that there are rules or a list of accepted texts. If that's reached by consensus it's as much a canon as anything else.
So if the license holders don't make one, or don't make it known, fans will try to make their own, resulting in endless arguments.
While canon in its strictest sense of religion can't be defined, when it comes to a fictional franchise canon does need to be defined by the licensor/studio for people coming in to work on that franchise. In a fictional property canon is defined by the owners. Or, at least, for Alien/vs/Predator it is. Or it was. I can't speak for how lose other properties may do it.
That's not to say official products can't incorporate fan theories or popular ideas from within the fandom, but it still has to be vetted and deemed as fitting by Studios/Fox/whatever.
I'm farming for talking points and comments for the upcoming podcast here. For reference, my view on it is I think it's a bit of a complicated topic. As a fandom canon is pointless to us because how many of us are going to be writing a novel, or developing a video game, or a comic in which it directly effects what we can do/what we can reference.
But on the flipside of that, if certain elements that we like/dislike are canon/not canon it effects whether or not we'll see them revisited going forwards.