[SPOILERS] Feral Predator Design Thread

Started by The Shuriken, Jun 05, 2022, 02:47:11 AM

Are you for the new Predator face or against?

I do like the new face design
30 (19.9%)
I do not like the new face design
74 (49%)
It is ok and I am willing to accept the new face design
47 (31.1%)

Total Members Voted: 150

Author
[SPOILERS] Feral Predator Design Thread (Read 150,097 times)

KaliPrime

KaliPrime

#120
Recalled from a recent interview with Trachtenberg that this predator in from the past and possibly from a different hemisphere of the planet they originate on. I think that is reason enough to switch it up. It comes down to execution. An amazing paint job can make a crap sculpt look good. A cleverly rendered sculpture will look good in all types of lighting.

Hardcore pred fans might be split but dammit I am so glad this is still a living, breathing film series. Could have died out so man y times with missteps of past directors. And yet it still keeps white knuckling it and hanging on. I am glad to see the creative license because it keeps this from stagnating. The lack of netting is honestly a welcome thing, not because I am opposed or supportive of it but because I get sick of repainting those damn things on the numerous custom figures I will inevitably be suckered into purchasing after this release.

No shame in my game lol.

"Hang on to your youthful enthusiasms – you'll be able to use them better when you're older." - Seneca

Immortan Jonesy

Quote from: Master on Jun 06, 2022, 07:08:47 AMThe more I stare at this pic, the more I think predator has no facemask other then this skull. I made a crude outline of mandibles and eye sockets of the creature:

https://i.imgur.com/j7qJS9J.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/dokyZM4.jpg
Quote from: Master on Jun 06, 2022, 07:08:47 AMThe more I stare at this pic, the more I think predator has no facemask other then this skull. I made a crude outline of mandibles and eye sockets of the creature:

https://i.imgur.com/j7qJS9J.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/dokyZM4.jpg

 ;D


KaliPrime

Lol! What a wonderful thing that we don't live in the universe where that design made it to the final film! Would have ruined my childhood. Plus would have been JVC in a suit and the monster would have always been associated with him. Instead we got this incredible template of iconic maasai lion hunting badassery paired with otherworldly mystery.

SiL

SiL

#123
Quote from: [cancerblack] on Jun 08, 2022, 11:32:11 PMI mean, using more than one head prop/mask for different shots would fix 95% of this, in a scenario where time and budget allow.
And this is exactly how ADI would do it if they were allowed. It's not even just a time and budget thing, either, it's client expectations. They've been very vocal about the fact that one of the problems with modern practical effects is producers wanting one effect that can do multiple things -- then complaining when it doesn't look good.

Winston himself had this issue throughout his career. Compare his work when his creations can be broken down into individual gags vs when the budget doesn't allow. There's always a noticeable bump in quality.

But nah that's also ADI's fault or something, I don't know.

Voodoo Magic

Voodoo Magic

#124
Quote from: Mikey on Jun 08, 2022, 10:40:55 PMI mean, rarely do you ever say it is any of the directors fault most times. The blame is mostly thrown at ADI. And if you do say it is director, or even producer choices, I can't recall it.

To be fair, perhaps you can't recall it because you haven't been as active maybe? Meaning, if we compare activity, I have 3x the posts of you in only 1/4 the time.

And there's a flipside to that coin. Rarely does - a few select people here - say any of it is ADI's fault, and are staunch defenders after three bodies of work and four directors visions pointing fingers every which way. After three films, it's fair when you see problems carried over from film to film to recognize a common denominator. (If we had three mediocre Predator films by the same writer where problems would reoccur, I'd be questioning the writer being right for the job right now). I already have major concerns with Mr. Davis.

But, I have acknowledged directors influences in these threads. But it's also fair that every director in every Predator film has influenced the work as well. Budget, time, factors in too. But none of that fully erases culpability or the ability to manage such difficulties an FX house faces to overcome such obstacles with levels of ingenuity, starting with the limited time and budget Stan Winston had to create the first Predator.

QuoteWe hear your frustrations and complaints, many of us share those, even while being friends with the ADI guys.

Who's we?

QuoteBut often we've heard that some of these issues are caused by a directors ask; like the mandibles in AvP being wider thanks to Anderson wanting them to go bigger, being one example.

We also never seem to talk about the time they don't have to work on the films. Often they have to scramble because they've been given little time, or are asked to completely redesign last minute like the Predalien because of some comment a producers kid made. The time factor is a huge part of the situation and it rarely feels acknowledged when you or some others are speaking about ADI. It's a nightmare having to change work that was good until someone unrelated comes around and changes the situation.

Personally, I hate the look of the unmasked Predators in PREDATORS, but I understand a lot of that is due to things like lack of time or budget, which is why Crucified's mouth and jaw just stick hung open. But I still would have faith in them as creature designers and wouldn't make it almost my own life mission, or base my personality around it, to call out their work at any chance I get.

I get that it usually is only involving the Predator and it's face when it comes to the criticisms, but it almost seems like a lot of people hear the name ADI and immediately lose their faith. I feel that if you have to point out that you've praised them in the past, it means that people might be used to hearing the complaints over the praise.

Having worked with Mike Dougherty, I'd talked to him about his favorite sfx companies he's worked with. ADI was his first and most talked about, he also almost had them on Krampus but they lost the bid. He said he's always got them as a first choice. ADI is highly respected and loved in the industry. They are absolutely not above critique, and I don't love all of their Predator work myself. But let's maybe wait and see before we get our panties in a bunch? While I want Stan designs too, he's gone, and his art along with it. I understand that. But what happens if ADI makes something different with the Predator, and it's f**king amazing? Will the tune change?

Not trying to be a huge defender here, just maybe giving a different perspective on how to view the films and their designs. Context helps me view the final product sometimes, but not always.


"But let's maybe wait and see before we get our panties in a bunch?"

"But I still would have faith in them as creature designers and wouldn't make it almost my own life mission, or base my personality around it, to call out their work at any chance I get."


Yeah, I thought I was getting into a nice discussion about this, but to see it's littered with pretentious passive aggressiveness, you lose all respect with me brother. It's the same delivery method you guys gave me when I broke the news that Prey (Skulls) would be a streaming release on Hulu. Not going to play into it no more.

Voodoo Magic

Voodoo Magic

#125
Quote from: SiL on Jun 08, 2022, 11:12:37 PM
Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Jun 08, 2022, 09:21:41 PMMy response:
So you're saying this was all on the director and unavoidable by ADI. Anderson blame: 100% / ADI blame: 0%

https://64.media.tumblr.com/0a1771ca992104d6dd71567ee4de7a43/tumblr_pmylellN1r1xuau3co1_500.gif
This is exactly what the director asked for - a more "handsome" Predator with less grotesque features and mandibles that could open really wide.

ADI nailed the brief.

I'm sure they don't like the excess skin either, but unless you've got a material that will give them the range of performance they need to do what the director wants, that's the payoff. Director wants stupid wide mandible roars, you need material to cover. And when that same material isn't being stretched, it has to go somewhere.

And if ADI says no, the production finds someone else who'll do it.

Same with Wolf's bobble head. The directors wanted a fully animatronic face, eyes included. Great, now you need to fit those mechanisms over an actor's head, while also asking them to make the body more streamlined. Bobble head.

They're not above critique by any stretch. But some critiques are ignorant and misguided.

I'll avoid the word "ignorant" but I believe this premise is misguided, and suggests the outcome is preordained regardless what minds or what ingenuity is currently doing your FX work. It's a simplistic assumption. It suggests all the flaws would have occurred regardless, even if Stan Winston or Weta was handling the fx versus ADI under the same conditions. We would have received exactly the same result. It's too ill-considered for me to treat seriously after three films.

Kradan

siiiiiiigh

Every f**king time ...

Mr.Turok

Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Jun 09, 2022, 02:20:40 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jun 08, 2022, 11:12:37 PM
Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Jun 08, 2022, 09:21:41 PMMy response:
So you're saying this was all on the director and unavoidable by ADI. Anderson blame: 100% / ADI blame: 0%

https://64.media.tumblr.com/0a1771ca992104d6dd71567ee4de7a43/tumblr_pmylellN1r1xuau3co1_500.gif
This is exactly what the director asked for - a more "handsome" Predator with less grotesque features and mandibles that could open really wide.

ADI nailed the brief.

I'm sure they don't like the excess skin either, but unless you've got a material that will give them the range of performance they need to do what the director wants, that's the payoff. Director wants stupid wide mandible roars, you need material to cover. And when that same material isn't being stretched, it has to go somewhere.

And if ADI says no, the production finds someone else who'll do it.

Same with Wolf's bobble head. The directors wanted a fully animatronic face, eyes included. Great, now you need to fit those mechanisms over an actor's head, while also asking them to make the body more streamlined. Bobble head.

They're not above critique by any stretch. But some critiques are ignorant and misguided.

I'll avoid the word "ignorant" but I believe this premise is misguided, and suggests the outcome is preordained regardless what minds or what ingenuity is currently doing your FX work. It's a simplistic assumption. It suggests all the flaws would have occurred regardless, even if Stan Winston or Weta was handling the fx versus ADI under the same conditions. We would have received exactly the same result. It's too ill-considered for me to treat seriously after three films.
I know nothing much of how the production pipeline is done, but the only reason why I can see someone like Stan Winston Studios being able to refuse or make changes on the contrary of the director's vision is that they are the gods of practical effects, arguing against them is like fighting a hurricane, they are masters of the craft and they know what they are doing. I can't fathom any director that can go against the genius that made the Jurassic Park, Alien, Predator, Terminator series become what they are today. When they have a reputation like that, can a producer or director argue against them? I can say for certain I honestly don't know how this works.

Wysps

Quote from: Kradan on Jun 09, 2022, 03:14:53 PMsiiiiiiigh

Every f**king time ...

It's always interesting to see what new and exciting paths the Sil and Voodoo debates take :laugh: 

Voodoo Magic

Quote from: Wysps on Jun 09, 2022, 03:34:14 PM
Quote from: Kradan on Jun 09, 2022, 03:14:53 PMsiiiiiiigh

Every f**king time ...

It's always interesting to see what new and exciting paths the Sil and Voodoo debates take :laugh:

LOL. Many fruitful years of this: ;D



Voodoo Magic

Voodoo Magic

#130
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Jun 09, 2022, 03:21:50 PMI know nothing much of how the production pipeline is done, but the only reason why I can see someone like Stan Winston Studios being able to refuse or make changes on the contrary of the director's vision is that they are the gods of practical effects, arguing against them is like fighting a hurricane, they are masters of the craft and they know what they are doing. I can't fathom any director that can go against the genius that made the Jurassic Park, Alien, Predator, Terminator series become what they are today. When they have a reputation like that, can a producer or director argue against them? I can say for certain I honestly don't know how this works.

Well, Stan did have a strong function over form aka form follows function philosophy.

Enjoy

Enjoy

#131
I am not watching the trailer but I am getting the impression this predator will have some cat like features. Feral Cat. This being on Disney + is huge

The Shuriken

Quote from: Enjoy on Jun 09, 2022, 04:19:23 PMI am not watching the trailer but I am getting the impression this predator will have some cat like features. Feral Cat. This being on Disney + is huge

It's going to stream on Hulu...

Nightmare Asylum

Quote from: The Shuriken on Jun 09, 2022, 05:12:54 PM
Quote from: Enjoy on Jun 09, 2022, 04:19:23 PMI am not watching the trailer but I am getting the impression this predator will have some cat like features. Feral Cat. This being on Disney + is huge

It's going to stream on Hulu...

Disney+ in territories that don't have Hulu.

Master

To be honets, I'm sad they dropped netting and dreadlock rings. I feel like with every entry we loose something from the design. I think the pick of simplification was The Predator.

AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News