Started by xenomorph36, Dec 26, 2007, 04:38:16 PM
Quote from: StrangeShape on Dec 08, 2020, 11:55:47 PMQuote from: [cancerblack] on Dec 06, 2020, 04:47:46 PMAvP is disgustingly mediocre in all regards. Disagree. The sets, their design and most importantly cinematography are really good. And huge credit for an actual buildup. It was always surprising to me that anyone would choose AVP:R over the first one but I guess we're all very different people. Also, while I wont deny the quality of the films are cartoony (AVP) or amateurish (AVPR), I think the credit should be given where its due, and AVP has some really good cinematography and shots
Quote from: [cancerblack] on Dec 06, 2020, 04:47:46 PMAvP is disgustingly mediocre in all regards.
Quote from: [cancerblack] on Dec 09, 2020, 10:13:17 PMQuote from: Kradan on Dec 09, 2020, 09:17:56 PMGunnison, Colorado is so much better, yeah ?Nah, I prefer Chigusa Corp space ranches.
Quote from: Kradan on Dec 09, 2020, 09:17:56 PMGunnison, Colorado is so much better, yeah ?
Quote from: SM on Dec 09, 2020, 10:48:44 PMThere is a look that I can't put my finger on with some Anderson film sets that scream 'fake'.
Quote from: SiL on Dec 10, 2020, 09:20:01 AMbut Anderson wanted gothic arches and spinning blade corridors
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 09, 2020, 11:40:15 PMQuote from: StrangeShape on Dec 08, 2020, 11:55:47 PMQuote from: [cancerblack] on Dec 06, 2020, 04:47:46 PMAvP is disgustingly mediocre in all regards. Disagree. The sets, their design and most importantly cinematography are really good. And huge credit for an actual buildup. It was always surprising to me that anyone would choose AVP:R over the first one but I guess we're all very different people. Also, while I wont deny the quality of the films are cartoony (AVP) or amateurish (AVPR), I think the credit should be given where its due, and AVP has some really good cinematography and shotsSets and cinematography are at the service of good story and interesting characters, two things AVP don't have. Besides that, it's a PG movie with alien and predator in it, absolute disgrace. Terrible movie overall.
Quote from: StrangeShape on Dec 14, 2020, 10:34:10 AMQuote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 09, 2020, 11:40:15 PMQuote from: StrangeShape on Dec 08, 2020, 11:55:47 PMQuote from: [cancerblack] on Dec 06, 2020, 04:47:46 PMAvP is disgustingly mediocre in all regards. Disagree. The sets, their design and most importantly cinematography are really good. And huge credit for an actual buildup. It was always surprising to me that anyone would choose AVP:R over the first one but I guess we're all very different people. Also, while I wont deny the quality of the films are cartoony (AVP) or amateurish (AVPR), I think the credit should be given where its due, and AVP has some really good cinematography and shotsSets and cinematography are at the service of good story and interesting characters, two things AVP don't have. Besides that, it's a PG movie with alien and predator in it, absolute disgrace. Terrible movie overall.Still at least AVP has some great shots, and if no one likes it at least the fact remains it does have grand cinematic visuals, giving the movie a sense of scale. Story quality of course is something to debate on but the movie sure looks like a big cinematic picture, as oppose to the cheap, unartistic feel and look to the B horror story of the second one
Quote from: Kradan on Dec 15, 2020, 06:16:41 PMAs much as I dislike Requiem, final showdown between Chet and Wolf was cool