I'm not saying the article is blindly ripping something apart. It's quite...well researched, in its own way, and they certainly put a lot of effort in for it. A+ for effort.
What I'm calling blind is your dismissal of my rebuttals. Now, granted, I pretty much made retard noises in a display of ridicule and added a healthy dollop of sarcasm, but nonetheless the points are valid, and those three questions are simply dumb. As with numerous others on that page.
I mean seriously. The helmet one? It didn't help Millburn. Therefore, the tacked on 'it could have saved them' is idiotic. The glass one? metal barriers move out of the way. The drug one? Well, this one is never answered, so I guess it's valid. Unless, you know, people are willing to make a minor connection. And some aren't. Like this guy.