Quote from: Xhan on Nov 20, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
hahaha... you obviously don't have a clue how much money and manpower was leveraged. This is Fox. Everything given to AQ and NOT given to AvPR is deliberate, as with the inclusion of the Nostromo files in legacy.
I am aware of the money and manpower involved. What you don't realize is how gullible you are. If the art department decided to call the aliens "Fuzzy Wuzzy Kitty Cats" would you blindly accept it?
Quote from: Xhan on Nov 20, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
Must have missed the last couple of years then, as LN is on its way out the door, and held onto mostly by old school biologists and archaeologists.
It hasn't been rejected by anyone but those who are willing to try to win an argument.
Quote from: Xhan on Nov 20, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
It describes a FRATRICIDAL thief who steals life FROM WITHIN. Rather apt considering GR and LC.
internecine from L.
internecinus "very deadly, murderous, destructive," from
internecare "kill or destroy," from
inter- (q.v.) +
necare "kill." Considered in the OED as misinterpreted in Johnson's Dictionary [1755], which defined it as "endeavouring mutual destruction," on association of
inter- with "mutual" when the prefix supposedly is used in this case as an intensive.
raptus, pp. of
rapere "seize, carry off" (see
rapid).
Compare to:
lingua [L] "tongue," also "speech, language"
foedus, foeda, foedum: "ugly, foul, loathsome"
Quote from: Xhan on Nov 20, 2007, 12:13:01 PM
on the otherhand DH's now as of John Shirley and the Reboot defunct Mangulation of latin doesn't even track because the wrong forms are used, A nor is it even spelled correctly, B and completely lacks context, C.
Which pales in comparison to your mangling of Latin, Greek and English.