It probably doesn't have much to do with the main theme of the thread (although it is the source of inspiration), but the other day I was reading this Wikipedia article on
"Change blindness":
QuoteChange blindness is a perceptual phenomenon that occurs when a change in a visual stimulus is introduced and the observer does not notice it.
Then, while I was thinking about the portrait of extraterrestrial life in science fiction (and even in speculative science), I asked myself...
What if we aren't able to recognize aliens even if we could have them in front of our eyes?Ok, maybe there are theories about
life forms that are not carbon-based (such as silicon-based life), but that seems to be the kind of alien life that most scientists are looking for in the universe because it is what we know here on Earth. Now think of intelligent civilizations, and the most serious initiative in that search is the SETI. But:
What if the intelligent aliens aren't communicating through radio signals?Perhaps there is a
confirmation bias in the search for extraterrestrial life, even when such research comes from the scientists themselves.
Then I started thinking about my favorite fictional extraterrestrial creature: The Alien.
Undoubtedly, this humanoid with a sexual organ like a head looks surreal. But all these shapes are familiar, and many of its stunning qualities (with the exception of acid instead of blood) can be found on Earth:
Even so, it's still the best alien monster of all. But now that we know its origins, it feels a little less alien. Even more so if you take into account that the Space Jockeys themselves are not so alien, either. But the Black Goo, on the other hand, it seems very enigmatic and unpredictable; almost like something magical. And we know absolutely nothing of its origins.
So I raise the following question: Is Black Goo more alien than the Alien itself?