Started by willyeckaslike, Aug 30, 2009, 10:11:22 PM
Quote from: ~Ezio~ on Sep 08, 2009, 10:16:57 PMIt's enough for RR, but it would be a plus if it were more ofcourse.
Quote from: Pvt. Hicks on Sep 08, 2009, 10:20:13 PMQuote from: ~Ezio~ on Sep 08, 2009, 10:16:57 PMIt's enough for RR, but it would be a plus if it were more ofcourse.So...enough for Rodriguez? The one who is producing this movie? You don't know what you're talking about. A bigger budget means a PG-13 rating. And even 40 million is generous. Think about it, the only Predator movie that did both good critically and financially was the original, 22 years ago. If I were a Fox executive, that's all I'd give the thing. Especially after two hated movies.Know what you're talking about, otherwise .
QuoteDude Predator now could be made with 10.000
Quote from: Johnny Handsome on Sep 09, 2009, 03:53:19 PMQuoteDude Predator now could be made with 10.000
Quote from: cloverfan98 on Sep 09, 2009, 08:17:06 PMI kinda hope they cast no name actors who can REALLY act. In lots of films casting unknowns have really helped, such as in Cloverfield, District 9, and most of all Alien.
Quote from: Pvt. Hicks on Sep 09, 2009, 10:14:03 PMQuote from: cloverfan98 on Sep 09, 2009, 08:17:06 PMI kinda hope they cast no name actors who can REALLY act. In lots of films casting unknowns have really helped, such as in Cloverfield, District 9, and most of all Alien.The appeal is that it's people you know. "Hey it's The Terminator!" "Hey, Apollo Creed!" "It's The Body from wrestling!". I expect Jason Statham, Clive Owen, Benicio Del Toro, anyone and everyone.
Quote from: SiL on Sep 01, 2009, 04:46:03 AMAfter seeing what District 9 did with 30 million, I have no worries about this budget.Hell, the first two Predator movies were lower-budget anyway.