Quote from: zuzuki on Sep 13, 2015, 04:30:51 AM
We don't know why they created us, what they wanted for us. All that we know is that they visited several times across all cultures.
That assumes it was all one faction undertaking the visitations - or even species. If Scott really
does want to explore ancient legends, it should really be many different factions
and species. Some referred to giants, but others referred to a whole host of different entities, all with differing agendas.
Heck, the legend of the Tower of Babel would have actually been a better fit for the film than the one about Prometheus!
Prometheus got punished for handing us some type of technology, but Babel was meant to have been about the gods judging humanity, itself, was becoming too dangerous.
QuoteMaybe they were guiding our evolution, they wanted us to evolve in a particular type of society. Maybe we became too violent and agressive towards eachother and we start waging wars and start killing our fellow man, and they didn't like that.
Again,
if these films are going to try and bring actual mythology into it, the gods actually desired our ability to fight amongst ourselves ('might is right' was actually a guiding principle in ancient Rome, because of the stories they followed about how the gods, themselves, constantly fighting one another). What they didn't want was for us to get co-ordinated and potentially overthrow them.
QuoteMaybe they sent and emissary as ''space Jesus'' (an evolved human that can perform ''miracles'' as seen by the people of that time), or even sent one of their own to try and correct our behavior, teach us there's another way to do things. But humanity killed their last chance so the Engineers decided we are beyond saving and we must be eradicated and start again.
As was observed after the film's release, that's no excuse for destroying the planet's entire ecosystem.
Also, why didn't they have the common sense to realise he needs some kind of means to self-defence - or transport the guy out of harm's way?
The reason Jesus got into the trouble he did, was because he was
rebel. He deliberately went into places like religious institutions and basically had arguments with folk. If we're saying he was a product of the Engineers, why did they 'programme' him to go around doing that if they were going to get pissed off about people in power trying to deal with him?
This whole Jesus-got-killed-so-the-whole-planet-must-pay deal just doesn't make sense. Not when it's thought through. Engineers decide every living thing needs to 'pay' for that? People living in the Americas and ancient Europe, too? Zebra? Plankton? That's insane, man!
Besides, he isn't the only historical figure who was reputed to be influenced/created by cosmic entities. Why get genocidal about him and not all the rest?
Especially if the prime motivator is meant to be about teaching
peace?
QuoteMaybe we are not the only planet they seeded and there are other experiments throughout the galaxy, failures and success stories. The sequel was setup in such away to provide answers on the Engineers motivations, but i feel that they aluded just enough in the first movie to spark interest
There are ways to work around it, just not by using Jesus.
Could just as easily point to two or more warring species/factions and say Earth was going to be used by the others to create/base some kind of super-weapon, which couldn't be allowed. Engineers needed to take it out and contingency plans kicked into effect at the last moment: A would-be cross-fire, rather than deliberate targeting.
Or maybe some other species had corrupted our genes with 'sleeper' DNA, which is scheduled to get activated at a future time? That could be a motivation to need to wipe us out, too.
Or maybe just faulty intelligence... Something being revealed about Earth which made them need to eradicate it, only for a last-minute revelation to stay their hand. Maybe the base we saw in the film simply never got the new data?
But going genocidal because Jesus got crucified? I don't buy it. Feels far too superficial. It needs to be something far bigger in scope than that.