Quote from: genocyber on Jan 26, 2017, 04:02:55 AM
QuoteAlmost as if audiences care more about the film itself than the stars in it, huh?
Well the film made 214.6 million dollars in the box office over its 90 million dollar budget, so despite it not being as good as it should have been it was still a success.
That's a worldwide number, though, so the studio only gets a portion of that $214 million. All I know is it came out at #4 opening weekend despite having the biggest ensemble of stars.
QuoteThe PG 13 point I brought up was a common complaint of why the film was not viewed so favorably compared to the previous two.
Yeah, I'm saying the decisions made around the film hurt it's box office and quality overall. Movies can be bigger than their stars now, and people usually won't want more of what they don't like; which is why I'm betting Expendables 4 will be R rated and focus on what fans loved about the first 2 (not a group of young Expendables).
QuoteTheir is also a fourth planned, so yes the audiences do care about the stars in it.
Well we will have to see how well the 4th does and if the amount of people who show up warrants the amount they're paying everyone in addition to the rest of the budget.
QuoteI still don't trust Shane Black directing this. He feels better as a writer than a director. Iron Man 3 was a mess.
That's fair, I can see why some fans wouldn't like IM3. Personally, I liked it and know Shane could only do so much in a restrictive Marvel universe. He's more in his element with Predator, though.
QuoteYou seemed to allude to [Dwayne Johnson] being unable to take part in this kind of project. I imagine he gets freedom to pick and choose what he wants, and if his schedule is filled its better to book him when his slot is free and wait. I know Marvel did that with Cumberbatch for Doctor Strange and it seemed to work well there.
His schedule is filled to the point he's risking over saturation. Don't get me wrong, I think Dwayne Johnson is great, but he has a crazy amount on his agenda. It's to the point that if he were cast, and The Predator is a success, we wouldn't see a sequel for another 8 years (I'm guessing). I mean, when is San Andreas getting a sequel? I imagine the studio (and fans) wants to reinvigorate the Predator franchise and not wait over 5 years for its sequels. Sure, you can say "it's worth it to make a good movie" but the studio and Shane Black is banking on making a good movie with the cast and talent they have now.
QuoteAlso I just want to point out that we're going to have a Predator movie with an autistic kid in a lead role who figures out their language. If you folks are going to go along with this then I don't ever want to hear bitching about the hieroglyph reading in AVP ever again.
Boyd Holbrook actually has the lead role, not the kid.
And as much as I can appreciate the AVP movies, the hieroglyph reading was the least of its issues and didn't bother me. I personally can suspend my belief with the kid, as it's been discussed in this thread why it may not be so farfetched (especially considering other moments that require suspension of belief even in the original film).