Started by Perfect-Organism, Feb 12, 2019, 02:17:48 AM
Quote from: The Old One on Jul 20, 2019, 03:25:45 AMI definitely agree, it's more interesting indeed but also harder to create believably and discuss within a traditional film narrative. I hope it is explored though, through the creators of the Engineers perhaps.
Quote from: Valaquen on Jul 20, 2019, 03:04:29 AMQuote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 19, 2019, 08:56:14 PMI don't know, I think I'd prefer something like the liquid metal guy from Terminator. Maybe I'm going too far with Giger's surrealism and biomechanoids (what works in a painting, it might not work in a movie). But in all honesty, I never saw the Space Jockey as a bipedal skeleton elephant. I always thought that the thing didn't have legs or that it was a shapeshifting being.Giger's own conception was that the Jockey was probably 'grown' to pilot the ship and nothing else. The creature had no other function (nor legs, because it never needed them). It's not analogous to human civilisation like the Engineers are. It was something we couldn't get our heads around. There were probably biomechanic platoons grown simply to fight, biomechanic navigators, pilots, god knows what. Maybe the ship had its own brain. Maybe in 'life' the derelict looked alabaster and translucent like some of Giger's other monsters and landscapes, instead of a dark metallic construct. Maybe the ship was an organism unto itself. Maybe instead of wiring and computer chips it had its own nervous system. There were a lot of cool ideas and themes in Giger's art about transcending biological limitations. His biomechanoids were sometimes warped and twisted in appearance but they had adapted to their environment and survived. Back in the 50's and 60's when Giger was young, there was a lot of fears about radiation and nuclear war. The biomechanoids were in part a response to all that.I just find all of that far more interesting.
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 19, 2019, 08:56:14 PMI don't know, I think I'd prefer something like the liquid metal guy from Terminator. Maybe I'm going too far with Giger's surrealism and biomechanoids (what works in a painting, it might not work in a movie). But in all honesty, I never saw the Space Jockey as a bipedal skeleton elephant. I always thought that the thing didn't have legs or that it was a shapeshifting being.
Quote from: Baron Von Marlon on Mar 09, 2019, 03:39:56 AMGiger's first and second depiction of the Jockey (this mural was supposed to be in the egg silo in Alien but I think it got cut because of the budget).Looks like a humanoid in a suit.Looks the same except the head's bigger, looks less humanand more alien.
Quote from: Valaquen on Jul 20, 2019, 03:04:29 AMGiger's own conception was that the Jockey was probably 'grown' to pilot the ship and nothing else. The creature had no other function (nor legs, because it never needed them). It's not analogous to human civilisation like the Engineers are. It was something we couldn't get our heads around. There were probably biomechanic platoons grown simply to fight, biomechanic navigators, pilots, god knows what. Maybe the ship had its own brain. Maybe in 'life' the derelict looked alabaster and translucent like some of Giger's other monsters and landscapes, instead of a dark metallic construct. Maybe the ship was an organism unto itself. Maybe instead of wiring and computer chips it had its own nervous system. There were a lot of cool ideas and themes in Giger's art about transcending biological limitations. His biomechanoids were sometimes warped and twisted in appearance but they had adapted to their environment and survived. Back in the 50's and 60's when Giger was young, there was a lot of fears about radiation and nuclear war. The biomechanoids were in part a response to all that.I just find all of that far more interesting.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jul 22, 2019, 08:32:45 AMQuote from: Valaquen on Jul 20, 2019, 03:04:29 AMGiger's own conception was that the Jockey was probably 'grown' to pilot the ship and nothing else. The creature had no other function (nor legs, because it never needed them). It's not analogous to human civilisation like the Engineers are. It was something we couldn't get our heads around. There were probably biomechanic platoons grown simply to fight, biomechanic navigators, pilots, god knows what. Maybe the ship had its own brain. Maybe in 'life' the derelict looked alabaster and translucent like some of Giger's other monsters and landscapes, instead of a dark metallic construct. Maybe the ship was an organism unto itself. Maybe instead of wiring and computer chips it had its own nervous system. There were a lot of cool ideas and themes in Giger's art about transcending biological limitations. His biomechanoids were sometimes warped and twisted in appearance but they had adapted to their environment and survived. Back in the 50's and 60's when Giger was young, there was a lot of fears about radiation and nuclear war. The biomechanoids were in part a response to all that.I just find all of that far more interesting.I like the idea that there's just a variety of different Giger-esque creatures servicing the ships. The Jockey wasn't going to fit in those corridors Dallas and co. came in through, so I like to think they had some other servant, or technician creatures, that were smaller and used those corridors for moving around and maintenance.