Quote from: The Cruentus on Mar 27, 2024, 06:33:02 PMRidley does have vision and style, the issue is that the first Alien film had others such as Dan O'Bannon that balanced things out and allowed a great product to come out of it. Prometheus and Covenant while visually good and enjoyable in some other ways, lacked anyone else to balance Ridley out. Ridley preferred a focus on AI over the alien creature.
Alien (1979) was the perfect lightning in a bottle.
Ron Cobb (production design/art), Dan O'Bannon (script), Ridley Scott (direction), HR Giger (iconic monster design).
These 4 dudes all fed the movie in unique ways that hightened the experience.
If you take one of them, the whole castle falls.
Now, i actually like Prometheus and Covenant (on a vacuum, but even then i agree with the majority of the criticism and why they are hated or divisive), but it did showed that Ridley Scott's personal vision of what the Alien franchise is, simply wasn't enough...
Now, Ridley Scott is an incredible director (that needs a good script) and his prequels are really well-directed and have great perfomances, but they lack what the other 3 gentlemen brought to the table.
But the point still remains, Ridley Scott was probably the only dude at the time that turned what could be a forgotten B-horror movie into a horror masterpiece.
His direction (monster shots) and the way he played with suspense, alongside with the very naturalistic perfomance of the actors is what brought this movie into the Halls of Fame.
Had it been any other director and the whole franchise and this very forum probably wouldn't have existed.