Quote from: Local Trouble on Feb 02, 2017, 12:56:58 AM
I don't see Hicks going along with a mutiny over something like bringing back specimens or sparing the colony. He didn't snap until Ripley convinced him that Burke released the facehuggers.
That's my thinking on the matter regarding Hicks. He would have followed the chain of command and if Gormon turned a blind eye to it, then he would go along with it, even if he had reservations about it. Now if that course of action led to the injury or death of one of his squadmates, then I could see him flipping. Hence why I say he is a bit of a wild card in the mutiny idea. He really could go either way, depending on the circumstances.
In the trio (Vasquez, Hudson, and Hicks), Hicks likely serves as the balance between the two extremes that are Vasquez (hot-headed one) and Hudson (consummate follower). His balance tempers Vazquez's anger issues and gives Hudson someone to follow (in the chain of command, Hicks would be Hudson's superior officer, Apone was Hick's superior officer, and Gormon was Apone's superior officer).
Now, using that trio imagery for a second... if Hicks and Vasquez were both in agreement on mutiny, then I can see Hudson following along. However, if Vasquez and Hudson were in agreement on mutiny (in this scenario, Hudson would follow Vasquez's lead due to her displaying leadership that Hick's wasn't providing for one reason or another), Hicks would likely be against it. However, I really don't see Hudson ever siding with Vasquez... they seem to be a part of different social circles within the squad (maybe social circles isn't the right way to put it... but I hope you get what I'm trying to get at).