In The News

Started by DoomRulz, Nov 30, 2012, 03:53:46 AM

Author
In The News (Read 1,427,013 times)

Rong

Rong

#3720
I know I kept reading, the f**ker made a documentary about woody... Bitch plz.

Cal427eb

Cal427eb

#3721

Aspie

Aspie

#3722
Quote from: Rong on Feb 02, 2014, 07:42:14 PM
I know I kept reading, the f**ker made a documentary about woody... Bitch plz.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I JUST GOT TO THAT PART

Cvalda

Cvalda

#3723
---aaaaaand it doesn't even take long getting to the "BUT LOOK AT ALL THIS SHIT MIA FARROW DID" crap. OH NO -- she might have had an affair with Frank Sinatra in 1987?!!! This invalidates everything.

Rong

Rong

#3724
If myself and aspie can see the flaws in the defence of Woody, only the biggest retards would fall for it.

Aspie

Aspie

#3725
LOL the article is basically being used on the internet as a shield for Woody Allen fans to preserve the image of their masturrr

Cal427eb

Cal427eb

#3726
what movies did he even make

BANE

BANE

#3727
I don't think him having made a documentary on Woody Allen should be a reason to immediately dismiss everything the guy is saying. That's stupid. I don't, however, think any of that extramarital stuff about Mia Farrow is necessary to his examination.

Aspie

Aspie

#3728
Quote from: Cal427eb on Feb 02, 2014, 07:53:15 PM
what movies did he even make

Xtro (1983)

Cal427eb

Cal427eb

#3729
wut

Rong

Rong

#3730
Quote from: BANE on Feb 02, 2014, 07:55:22 PM
I don't think him having made a documentary on Woody Allen should be a reason to immediately dismiss everything the guy is saying. That's stupid. I don't, however, think any of that extramarital stuff about Mia Farrow is necessary to his examination and makes it seem like he's trying to discredit the accusers as a means of defense for Woody.

No but all the other disclaimers and bias are.


BANE

BANE

#3732
Quote from: Rong on Feb 02, 2014, 07:57:13 PM
Quote from: BANE on Feb 02, 2014, 07:55:22 PM
I don't think him having made a documentary on Woody Allen should be a reason to immediately dismiss everything the guy is saying. That's stupid. I don't, however, think any of that extramarital stuff about Mia Farrow is necessary to his examination and makes it seem like he's trying to discredit the accusers as a means of defense for Woody.

No but all the other disclaimers and bias are.
What, that he chats with him every once in a while?



AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News