How good is the firepower in Aliens compared to what we have today?

Started by shadowedge, Mar 25, 2012, 04:18:46 AM

Author
How good is the firepower in Aliens compared to what we have today? (Read 9,245 times)

chupacabras acheronsis

it's a good tactic since the smartgun will track and open up on anything far quicker than any human reaction, they have that door covered well enough. they're probably instructed to leave the gun do it's thing and only take care of giving it a decent fire cone/kill field, that's what makes the most sense.

Xenomorphine

Quote from: shadowedge on Mar 25, 2012, 04:18:46 AM
I am not an expert at guns at all. I don't really know anything about them really. That said how does the firepower in Aliens compare to what we give our modern military today?

The sentry guns are essentially what are starting to see large-scale use now. Almost precisely teh same principle is now in use on security barriers Israel uses. They're situated in enclosed dome sort of things, which makes them a lot more protected and there's meant to be a human operator for each one.

The Colonial Marine version is a bit more effective than them, however, because of the apparently more advanced motion sensory apparatus being used. Something we have now, but theirs appeared to filter out a lot of things (apparently not hamsters, but there were a lot of loosely-hinged doors and stuff) and be used at considerable distance without walls and the like interfering.

Motion trackers seem to be quite the game-changer for the Colonial Marines. The only flaw  - as the film showed - is that they have no indication of a target's elevation.

And, of course, would be of no use for fighting in the airless vacuum of space.

The smart gun was a fantastic concept, but has recently been surpassed, in actual functionality, by the advent of guided bullets! Of course, who's to say they don't also use that in conjunction with the guided barrel? Not terribly necessary, but it's a possibility.

Alternatively, we don't know what they fire. The initial edition of the technical manual, when it was printed in the comics before becoming a book, had the smart guns firing not munitions, but lasers. This was done to reflect the fact that Vasquez and Drake handed over batteries instead of ammunition and does a better explanation of the potential function... Firstly, both would have been able to fire the weapons manually - why wouldn't Frost have also demanded their magazines? Secondly, making the smart gun a direct energy weapon makes more sense in light of guided bullets - you can't guide a beam of light. You'd need to cue the entire barrel.

Form what I remember, the letters page received a lot of criticism from readers who just simply preferred the thoguht of them firing bullets, because it sounded like that. :) Then the book came along and the things had an alternative description...

With all of that in mind, however - especially with Hudson's comments about them having access to direct energy weapons - it's worth considering that the smart guns might be this.

In that respect, they'd be well in advance of today's infantry weapons. Depending on how much energy is focused per beam, they might even be more powerful than the pulse rifles are capable of being.

Also worth remembering is that the Colonial Marines have access to thermal vision. We don't know if that same monocle can also see in other wavelengths, only that this was the one they were ordered to use. Regardless, even if that's all they're capable of, it's likely to be a lot more advanced than today's thermal sensors are.

All the rest is more or less applicable to what we have today, but we know what Hudson boasted of, so... It's fair to say that what we saw on screen was a little more capable than what a small squad of today's US Marines would have access to, while what was likely in reserve on the Sulaco, what they could have brought, but didn't, was even more radically advanced than anything in today's military arsenal.

We also have no idea what the dropship or Sulaco fired. What the capabilities of the dropship's missiles were.

Don't rely heavily on the technical manual. It's already obsolete. :) It even has the dropship firing unguided rockets from the pods, but as from a few years ago, two or three manufacturers figured out a way to retrofit those types of rocket pods on gunships with guidance, essentially making them incredibly cheap, low-yield Hellfire missiles. Its' likely the dropship fires something like that from those pods and that they're for anti-personnel use, while the larger missiles are for use against vehicles - but there's no indication of how they'd operate. They seem to be rocket-based, but whether they have a tighter turning radius than today's missiles, what the warheads are and if they've got the same restrictions of locking on... We can't really say. In all probability, they're a lot better.

The Sulaco is most definitely much more advanced than today's space vehicles! It's got some sort of turrets upon it. Or at least, I assume they're weapons... They might be communications arrays for all I know. But let's assume they are - no way to tell if they're particle beams, railguns/coilguns or are, in actual fact, steerable missile launchers.

We know it's capable of launching nuclear munitions, but the film never clarified whether these would have been in the form of missiles, like the dropship carried or would have been along the lines of the 'rods from God' concept.

As for the APC, hmm... Was Hudson referring to the turret being able to make a city go 'VWAP'? If so, damn... Wouldn't like to go up against one of them! He does slap his hand against the vehicle they're riding in when he says it, which could be an indication of that. Alternatively, he might have been referring to the minigun-like turret on the dropship or something the Sulaco had.

Vasquez also referred to cannisters of nerve gas... Would these have been manually handled by the Marines or was the APC fitted with some sort of hidden grenade launchers? Or did the APC or dropship have some form of remotely-controlled drones which would have been piloted into the nest, fitted with a launcher? We have those, today, in the form of things like SWORDS, which can be fitted with grenade launchers.

All in all, yes. The Colonial Marines are precisely what they seem: A logical evolution of today's combat soldier. If more Colonial Marines were portrayed in a new film, however, you'd most likely have to play on Hudson's quote and show that carrying a few sentry guns, couple of smrat guns and being mostly outfitted with pulse rifles and flamethrowers would be absolute bare minimum for something like an investigatory search-and-rescue. That if they were going into a hostile combat situation, rather than trying to locate civilians, they'd be taking a lot more with them.

Quote from: CarnalCalligraphy on Mar 25, 2012, 11:24:30 PM
Okay, so if true to the original films, how would a predator fare against the Marine unit in Aliens. I'd also like to know how you think a Predator might fare against a modern spec ops unit.

Poorly - assuming they knew an opponent was out there. :)

Colonial Marines have the advantage of things like motion trackers, remote sentries and smart guns. Dutch's team never did.

Also, the environments were different. If they worked together, those enclosed corridors would have been a death funnel for the Predator. Whenever I've had the extremely rare good fortune to play with others who bother to co-ordinate tactics on the recent game, we've never had any trouble taking down groups of Aliens or Predators. Most players can't be bothered, though and just go running around aimlessly.

Which is why they keep on getting killed. :)

RagingDragon

A fun thread, indeed.

I'd like to drop some comments about the Smartgun as well.  I believe it's far superior for it's purpose as a crew-served heavy machine gun than what we have today.  If you think about a military unit, there are rifleman, grenadiers, light machine gunners (SAW), and heavy machine guns.  In the American Army, you have three rifle squads and one weapons squad in the platoon, with the weapons squad packing the HMGs and sometimes Anti-Tank weapons or mortars.

Normal HMGs are crew-served weapons.  Rambo and John Matrix don't think so, but in reality, there are two or three men devoted to one gun in the field.  Two guns equal four to six men, the more experienced soldier being the shooter and team leader, and the private being an "AG" or assistant gunner, carrying rounds, extra barrels, tripods, cleaning equipment, etc...

Machine guns are heavy, large, cumbersome, and require a good deal of maintenance and planning to use effectively.  Their operators have the shortest lifespan of any soldier in a direct-fire unit, and they are meant to be placed on either a bipod or tripod in a fighting position for best application.  Knowing this, the concept of a one-man heavy machine gun that has superior targeting ability, virtually no recoil, and a high degree of mobility is a Platoon Leader's dream come true.

(There are even battle drills where they need to set up a firing position that doesn't support a bipod, so the AG squats and rests the gun on his shoulder while the team leader fires.  It's pretty rad, but you best have dem earplugs.)

If you read the USCM Tech Manual, it talks about the USCM being a highly mobile, hard-hitting force that can fulfill multiple roles with far less manpower.  The way they break down their fireteams is unique, with two two-man teams forming a squad, rifle + tracker and rifle + Smartgun.  You can see this organization in Aliens as the marines maneuver through the complex, if you pay attention.  Mobility and flexibility are top priorities to USCM doctrine, and the Smartgun fits these tactics perfectly.

As for the battery scene, the Smartgun very well could not be able to be fired without power if the rounds were electronically fired (no firing pin, but an electric pusle that ignites the powder) or for many other sci-fi reasons such as integrated gun circuitry and built-in electronic safeties.  To say otherwise doesn't hold water.

A quick comment on Sentries, I believe that they were intended for application just like they were shown in the film.  Indoors, with a limited range and firing area.  Their use on a larger battlefield would entirely depend on their effective range, which includes target acquisition.  This is also mentioned in the tech manual, with regards to Sentries being connected to Sensor Networks.  A lot of other weapons in the USCM armory are like this, and can link up with emplaced mobile sensors and networks to obtain a larger set of target data.  This most likely also effects their range.

Two cents, please keep up this awesomeness.

chupacabras acheronsis

chupacabras acheronsis

#18
best two posts of the thread right there!

on the subjects of the sentry turrets, the software and hardware for self guided emplacements exists, and it's far, far easier to apply than you think. so easy in fact that this guy is making some buck out of this backyard invention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxBa5bQfTGc#

and here's worst korea's shot, with the cheesiest stock music they had. notice the boxes on target, the field of fire symbol, and all the little counters. reminds you of something...?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkAmpMy8liQ#

Xenomorphine

LOL, music. :D

Found the Israeli one!

Got a neat opening/closing armoured dome thing to give it protection. I think they put these towers at regular intervals within the security walls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNyxFJ1gWa8#

chupacabras acheronsis

due to some very convenient coincidence, i was at an airshow yesterday, and i saw a turret like that. console and everything. i'll put the pics in the pic thread shortly.

the only design in the movie i find so-so is the APC. side placement for a door means that the marines have to jump out into incoming fire while the vehicle fires, or the vehicle has to expose it's wide side to completely cover them. the miniguns would do much better to the other side of the hull in that second case. Also, the big wheels must need a needlessly complex axis(which broke much more easily than what a modern tank or IFV would withstand), to work on their own while leaving space inside. the vehicle is too low to take advantage of the big wheels too, it should at least have more open mudguards to stop the belly from scratching the ground at every slope or ramp. big wheels are a bad idea in general when you're getting shot at, you need to armor those pretty well adding to weight that could be used for something else. and it's got bradley syndrome, what's with being tall as hell. marines shouldn't need to stand up while riding anyways.

HappyAlien

The problem with most sci-fi films is that they over estimate space flight technology such as films like Blade Runner where in 2017 we have 'off -world' colonies (were not even going to have a moon colony until at least 2060-70!). Yet they underestimate small technology such as guns and phones. Those pads they have in Star Trek the Next Generation look less advanced than an Apple Iphone! So you have the problem of a bunch of marines in a ship which is probaly way too advanced for the early 22nd century carry weapons that don't look too much more advanced than weapons today and in helmets that look less advanced than the helmets soldiers wear today.

Plus by that time they would have gunbs that could shoot around corners and they would send in drones to check the colony look what a predator drone can do today by the 22nd century you would have ones small enough and advanced to go inside the colony and check for people. But them we wouldn't have our great film. Its hard to predict what type of tech we will have in the furure and most films get it wrong.

Now to your question apart from the motion tracker the marines don't really have that much that would make them superior to a current army marine unit. Maybe their body armor is a lot tougher than current armor so 5.56mm bullets we use today  couldn't penetrate while their explosive tip ammo would go right through current body armor that could be one definate advantage!

SM

*LATE 22nd century.

HappyAlien

sorry your right about 2187 so that makes the guns look even more dated!

SM


HappyAlien

so Alien was about 2122, did they have an actual date in the film or is it from the script?


HappyAlien

so Aliens is set exactly 200 years after 1979 when Alien (the film ) was released, maybe Cameron did that on purpose?

SM

Probably coincidence but I don't know for sure.

If you use non-US dating (ie. dd-mm-yy, rather than mm-dd-yy), Burke sent that directive on the exact Australian release date of Alien.  ;D

RagingDragon

Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 03, 2012, 01:54:52 AM
best two posts of the thread right there!

on the subjects of the sentry turrets, the software and hardware for self guided emplacements exists, and it's far, far easier to apply than you think. so easy in fact that this guy is making some buck out of this backyard invention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxBa5bQfTGc#

and here's worst korea's shot, with the cheesiest stock music they had. notice the boxes on target, the field of fire symbol, and all the little counters. reminds you of something...?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkAmpMy8liQ#
Pirates of the Caribbean, bawwww.  That paintball turret so awesome it made me want to cry, though.  I bet that's not cheap.  I better start saving now. :laugh:

Just coincidence that the Korean one looks like ED-209?!  Lol come on, when it was talking to that guy I was waiting for a good ole' ED-209 moment of glory.  Actually it looks like if ED and Metal Gear Rex had a baby...

Spoiler
[close]

Quote from: HappyAlien on Apr 03, 2012, 04:54:32 AM
The problem with most sci-fi films is that they over estimate space flight technology such as films like Blade Runner where in 2017 we have 'off -world' colonies (were not even going to have a moon colony until at least 2060-70!). Yet they underestimate small technology such as guns and phones. Those pads they have in Star Trek the Next Generation look less advanced than an Apple Iphone! So you have the problem of a bunch of marines in a ship which is probaly way too advanced for the early 22nd century carry weapons that don't look too much more advanced than weapons today and in helmets that look less advanced than the helmets soldiers wear today.

Plus by that time they would have gunbs that could shoot around corners and they would send in drones to check the colony look what a predator drone can do today by the 22nd century you would have ones small enough and advanced to go inside the colony and check for people. But them we wouldn't have our great film. Its hard to predict what type of tech we will have in the furure and most films get it wrong.

Now to your question apart from the motion tracker the marines don't really have that much that would make them superior to a current army marine unit. Maybe their body armor is a lot tougher than current armor so 5.56mm bullets we use today  couldn't penetrate while their explosive tip ammo would go right through current body armor that could be one definate advantage!

I think about this constantly, like what we thought the future might look like and what it actually looks like. :laugh:  It just cracks me up that there's 70's, 80's, and 90's versions of the future, all so different.  Aliens is also quite dated by the rapidly advancing telecommunication industry.  Everything would probably be fully integrated with strong military wireless networks with all kinds of electronic madness going on.


AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News