The design in Alien Covenant absolutely sucked. Head looks like black matte plastic, body is really skinny, and it moved like a complete turd with all that CGI crap except in a few scenes. Pretty much the same sh!t from Alien 3.
[/quote]
But you are forgeting the fact that on Covenant the xeno walk on its four legs almost all time and not bipedly.
[/quote]
That's the reason it sucked mostly. Even when bipedaling, it looked like fake cgi utter crap.
Quote from: windebieste on Mar 03, 2019, 09:42:40 PM
Appreciate the greater scope of Ridley's vision for these movies and you'll understand the Covenant design is the first in an iterative process. It's David's first 'creation' and lacks the biomechanical features of later creatures we see in 'ALIEN' and 'ALIENS'.
There's a piece of dialogue David delivers at some point (It's not in the movie - I'm not sure of it's origin) that gives it all away "The future is neither organic or synthetic - it's biomechanical". This statement alone tells us he's not finished with the design of the creature. That what we see in 'ALIEN' is yet to be made.
So, it's not a bad design, but part of a much larger plan on the part of the film maker. This story isn't supposed to end with 'ALIEN Covenant'. The movie's closing scene was a clear indicator of more to come.
The Covenant Alien was just the start. ...and yes. Like Stompy, it too has digitigrade legs. (NECA makes good stuff, huh.)
-Windebieste.
If that's true and a different better design closer to the original shows up, with a quick mention of the transformation etc. than I'd completely forgive the AC design, it would make sense.