Sorry stephen, I was talking to SM. I hope this misunderstanding doesn't offend you.
Quote from: SM on Feb 23, 2012, 02:11:36 AM
I would've loved to have seen Ward's script realised - I just don't know how the wooden planet would've been explained.
QuoteSM, I have been saying that for the past several pages.
It's not gonna work.
By the way, I would like to voice my appriciation towards your well thought out and scholarly arguments about this film.
Of all this film's critics, your arguments are the most legitimate.
You're too kind.
RE: The sacrifice - it's probably already been said, but Ripley sacrificing herself for people she will never know means WAY more, than people she does know. The latter option makes things easier.
Yes. it is much more selfless to do this for strangers. For someone you know there is a personal reason and more insentive to do it. Since she had less insentive, her final decision is all the more heroic.
Stephen,
What I cannot understand about your argument is the entire point of it is Ripley's death, yet this blatantly disregards the conclusion, which was the death of the alien and the destruction of company prospects.
You bring up Hudson's death as an example, yet there is a huge difference.
Hudson didn't destroy the next generation of xenomorphs with his death. Ripley did. She didn't want to die until AFTER discovering she was carrying the next queen. Before then she fought just as hard to stay alive, and continued to fight as such afterwards. Upon discovering she was carrying the queen, she destroyed it just like she would have any other. Her death was just what was necessary to do so. Yes, she wanted to die with the runner in the led, but when it came up after her, she didn't sit still and let it kill her, she doused it in the water and destroyed it. She even considered Bishop II's offer for life when she asked for reassurance that it would be killed. When he dodged the answer, she said "Okay. Screw you. This little bitch is going down. This one is for my friends."
I cannot and do not understand your argument of it being in vain and her being defeated when you simply focus on the fact she died and disregard the very reason she died and the successful completion of her goal. Her goal was to destroy the queen and keep it out of company hands. She succeeded. This breaking down of facts goes against the very definition of something that is in vain.
As far as most of us are concerned, that is the end of the story and one of Ripley's crowning moments of heroism.
If it was her surrender, why was it scored with such triumphant music? Upon seeing this scene at the age of 12, it was my favorite part of the film. I stood up and cheered and said "Ripley, you are awesome. God speed and rest in peace."