Quote from: Local Trouble on May 24, 2023, 06:40:46 AMDear ralfy,
I hope this letter finds you well. You posed an interesting question about the decision by the U.S. military and the Extrasolar Colonization Administration (ECA) to dispatch the Colonial Marines to LV-426, seemingly due to a downed transmitter. I'll try to shed some light on this.
First, let's consider the nature of the U.S. military and ECA's roles in space exploration and colonization. Both these entities are charged with safeguarding the interests of humanity on a vast cosmic scale. Their responsibilities span not only territorial claims and resource exploitation but also include the safety and well-being of colonists and maintaining peace and security in human-occupied space.
The case of LV-426 is a delicate one, primarily because the colony was co-financed by the company against mineral rights. Despite this, it's important to understand that the company's financial involvement did not bestow upon it any authority to command military forces or to unilaterally make decisions about the safety of the colony.
In responding to the situation on LV-426, the military and ECA likely adhered to a protocol designed to handle potential threats or emergencies. The absence of communications from a colony is, at the very least, a cause for concern. At worst, it could imply a catastrophe that could endanger lives or strategic interests. Therefore, even if the cause was suspected to be a mere downed transmitter, it would still necessitate a robust response to confirm the situation and ensure the safety of the colonists.
Sending the Colonial Marines might seem like an overreaction for a potential technical glitch, but their deployment can be seen as a precautionary measure. The Marines are well-equipped to handle a variety of situations, from technical repair and troubleshooting to crisis management in the event of an actual disaster. Also, if a more sinister event had occurred, such as an insurrection or an extraterrestrial encounter, a rapid and well-armed response would be crucial.
The ultimate goal of this decision would be to prioritize the safety and security of human lives and assets over potential cost implications. Given the vast distances and the inherent risks involved in extrasolar colonization, it is generally better to err on the side of caution.
I hope this explanation has helped shed some light on why the Colonial Marines were sent to LV-426. Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions on this or any other topic.
Best regards,
ChatGPT
I don't think they thought that only a glitch took place for reasons given earlier. To recap,
The company has a history of investigating these thoroughly for monetization, and even willing to sacrifice their employees and assets to do so. And it's obvious that if bioweapons are involved, then the government via the military would profit from that, too.
They had Space Marines engaged in "bug hunts" and encountering "Arcturians," so they definitely encountered various organisms in other worlds, too. Also, those points question what one board member said about what they found (or didn't) in hundreds of worlds.
They already had the location of the derelict alien ship, so it was simply a matter of investigating it. And yet for some weird reason the board does not choose to do so, Ripley says only but after she's penalized, and Burke is supposed to do so by himself even though everyone in the board and Ripley know the location, too.
As revealed in this thread, the team did not come prepared, as it had only one combat medic, and correctly so, because it was a rescue mission. And given Bishop's attention towards the facehuggers, the goal was essentially to retrieve what was found.
Given the fact that "bug hunters" were chosen and that Ripley was asked to join them (and to even come up with a brief for the Marines), then that means they either believe what Ripley said or the infestation was not quick, just like in the first movie, and that the colony was able to report what they found. I think it's both. Also, in which case, Ripley's off the hook, but for some reason she doesn't connect the dots to say so.
There are more problems that take place when you think of the latter plus Ripley's failure to raise the point about the location of the alien ship during the inquiry, after which van Leuwen would have (wrongly) pointed out to her that they don't need to check the location because colonists had been living on the rock for years and didn't see anything (LOL).
Anyway, this is still on-topic because it explains why the Sulaco was used.
Quote from: Acid_Reign161 on May 24, 2023, 09:10:20 AMQuote from: SiL on May 24, 2023, 03:18:07 AM@Acid_Reign161 I've had this same conversation using these same points, you are wasting your time.
Yes, it does appear to be falling on deaf ears... 😅 Evidently some people watched a different Alien Trilogy than we did. 🤣
Every point I gave came from the movie. LOL.
The board refers to ship's logs found in the lifeboat, but for some weird reason they only refer to the fact that the Nostromo landed on the rock and took off. Nothing about the ship computer waking the crew and reporting a distress beacon and changing the ship course, and nothing about the location of the landing site. Why? Because it was never raised throughout the inquiry, and by Ripley only after she's sentenced. Why do we know that? Because the company would have raised the info on the colony then. Ripley hears about it for the first time only after the hearing.
To make matters worse, when she asks van Leuwen to investigate the location, he says they don't have to because colonists have been living on the rock and didn't see anything. Which, for anyone with common sense, is a wrong answer.
So, where did Burke get the location information? If it's from the logs in the lifeboat, then why didn't Ripley raise that point during the inquiry? The movie shows that it was raised after, which is why she's shocked after discovering that there was a colony on the rock. And if Burke didn't get it from the log, then where?
Later, Burke tells Ripley that they lost transmission, but it's probably only a downed transmitter. But just in case, they need to send an armed contingent to be sure, and one that specializes in "bug hunts" and encountered "Arcturians" (both also raised in the movie, but during the briefing scene), and want Ripley to come along because, you know, she's good in fixing transmitters. (LOL) In return, they can implicitly take back their insistence that she's a liar. (Another LOL.)
And on and on an on. I already raised these points in this and in the other thread, it it looks like most either didn't watch the movie more than once or that they're trying to maintain their fanboi view. Whatever, you're free to discuss this matter further in the other thread. All I'm giving are what I think are the better reasons why the Sulaco was sent, and it definitely involves more than just a downed transmitter, sending any armed group "just to be sure," Burke working alone, and Ripley not thinking straight as she does not even consider asking the board to investigate the location as it's the only evidence she has available to prove her innocence, and then does not question why she's asked to join a mission that's supposed to be based on the premise that she was not telling the truth.
One more point: given what happened in the third movie, where they were in frequent communication with the company, then it looks like there is either inconsistent technological development or incredible levels of design and human flaws in their systems. But since there are too many, and few of them involve the Sulaco itself, then I'll mention them in the other thread.
https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=59486.180But you can probably share some points here for the OP.