Started by DoomRulz, Nov 30, 2012, 03:53:46 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 30, 2014, 01:46:00 PMBetter question, why wouldn't you want to redesign plants and animals?
Quote from: Aspie on Mar 30, 2014, 01:53:13 PMhey Doomrulz do u believe homosexuality is what nature intended
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 30, 2014, 01:52:16 PMNature is not an entity and can not have needs, wants, or intentions.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2014, 02:25:50 PMQuote from: Aspie on Mar 30, 2014, 01:53:13 PMhey Doomrulz do u believe homosexuality is what nature intendedYes, homosexuality is natural.
Quote from: BANE on Mar 30, 2014, 02:47:29 PMOr it is natural and is merely a built in population control mechanism.Dun DUN DUUUUN!
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 30, 2014, 02:45:57 PMQuote from: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2014, 02:25:50 PMQuote from: Aspie on Mar 30, 2014, 01:53:13 PMhey Doomrulz do u believe homosexuality is what nature intendedYes, homosexuality is natural. Not when heterosexuality is required to produce offspring. http://i.gyazo.com/b545459f6274b000c3461fe19a635ed8.pngUsing this definition we can deduct that homosexuality is indeed unnatural. Just because it occurs in nature doesn't make it natural. Homosexuality is contrary to the ORDINARY course of nature, which is the definition of unnatural.
