Alien Resurrection: 1997 Theatrical Cut or 2003 Special Edition

Started by LastSurvivor92, Mar 20, 2014, 11:44:58 AM

Alien Resurrection: Which was the more superior cut of the film? The 1997 Theatrical Cut or 2003 Special Edition

1997 Theatrical Cut
24 (57.1%)
2003 Special Edition
18 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 42

Author
Alien Resurrection: 1997 Theatrical Cut or 2003 Special Edition (Read 35,452 times)

Morgoth

The special edition. It adds more character development to Ripley. Although I could do without the Wal-mart reference. I know I'll get shunned for saying this but this is my second favorite film in the series.

LastSurvivor92

LastSurvivor92

#31
Quote from: SM on Mar 21, 2014, 10:48:25 PM
*Judith.
Quote from: Local Trouble on Mar 21, 2014, 10:25:15 PM
Like Jude?

:laugh: you guys crack me up


Quote from: nerdy916 on Mar 22, 2014, 02:01:32 AM
The special edition. It adds more character development to Ripley. Although I could do without the Wal-mart reference. I know I'll get shunned for saying this but this is my second favorite film in the series.

I'm not shunning you and I don't think anyone else should especially if their an Alien fan. Some people just can't except the dark humor in the movie and I get that but its like beating a dead horse. "Ok we get you hate the comedy in it....but lets move on." People complain about the Aliens when the Aliens look even better in most shots than the composited Alien in Alien 3. It was time to do something different and it was fun and really refreshing. Not everything makes sense in the film but I forgive those little plot holes because every Alien film has at least one shot where they jumped the shark a little.

Like cutting from fake Ash head to real Ash head in the same shot. I mean even back them I'm sure many noticed that.

Local Trouble

Your relentless positivity in the defense of the utterly mediocre is admirable.

The1PerfectOrganism

The1PerfectOrganism

#33
Quote from: Local Trouble on Mar 22, 2014, 03:14:20 AM
Your relentless positivity in the defense of the utterly mediocre is admirable.

Less than mediocre I'd say. It's enjoyable but only a third as good as the rest.

Local Trouble

I made an allowance for the possibility that my hatred of this movie isn't shared by all.  Calling it utterly mediocre was an act of generosity on my part.

The1PerfectOrganism

The1PerfectOrganism

#35
I don't hate it but I hate the influence it's had on the franchise.
And the film is no-where near as good as the other four IMO.

Local Trouble

You should go watch it right now.  It has Ron Perlman in it.

The1PerfectOrganism

The1PerfectOrganism

#37
Quote from: Local Trouble on Mar 22, 2014, 03:22:23 AM
You should go watch it right now.  It has Ron Perlman in it.

It's three in the morn and I just finished watching the theatrical of the first two, I rarely ever watch Resurrection. Lol
I think a lot in it is awful but I can enjoy bits of it every so often.

Local Trouble


The1PerfectOrganism

The1PerfectOrganism

#39
No I don't think he makes it any better.

Brad Dourif is good though.


Shame he's only in it for like five minutes.

Local Trouble

I figured you for a Dan Hedaya fan.

The1PerfectOrganism

The1PerfectOrganism

#41
I don't even know who that is lol.

Local Trouble


HuDaFuK

General Martin Allahandro Carlos Perez, to be correct.

LastSurvivor92

Quote from: Local Trouble on Mar 22, 2014, 03:34:33 AM
General Perez.

I'm just curious Local Trouble but what do you dislike about Resurrection?

AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News