Quick question, which of the 2 approaches of this Predator film are you more interested in. A continuation that involves Arnold's character Dutch Schaffer returning and further devolving him, a concept that feels like a continuation of the first film, regardless whether it takes the other sequels into a account it strongly ties to the original film.
Or the other approach which is what has happened before with the other Predator sequels which have an episodic quality, isolated incidences involving a Predator hunt, continuity isn't too important, its simply a new film featuring the Predator, with no returning characters or continuing narrative arc. Just a new story feature the Predator we all know and love.
The Return of Arnold would be a warm welcome, though at his age may put that in doubt and come across as forced, still getting over how cool he was in Terminator Genisys though the movie didn't hold up that great.
The other possibilities are seeing a Predator movie in different time periods, while I'm not too crazy about the whole prequel angle because, it could be an interesting approach.
Which is more inciting? Straight up tie in to events sequel or stand alone movie.
Another question, a percent of Aliens fans are divided over the approach Blomkamp wanted to take with his Alien movie heavily suggesting he wanted to make a movie following Alien and Aliens "Lets Not get into the whole, I won't believe anything about retconing until they officially announce it".
Whereas Predators continuity doesn't tie directly as progressive story line like Alien, Predator film involve isolated incidence where a Predator shows up to hunt.The Predator sequel have a brief mention of the original films events and expand the mythology it their own way.
Which are you more interested in? Shane's Predator or Neill's Alien "Assuming Fox's delaying of the film hasn't canned it entirely"