Started by Corporal Hicks, Jun 13, 2020, 08:04:09 PM
Quote from: Kradan on Jun 14, 2020, 05:28:57 PMYou mean four-armed one ? It was the closest to Big Chap thing I've ever seen
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jun 14, 2020, 11:31:13 AMPrefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?
Quote from: j0nesy on Jun 13, 2020, 11:38:04 PMi agree! though i would have liked to see more of a complete version of the cg monster
Quote from: SM on Jun 14, 2020, 08:09:10 PMQuote from: 426Buddy on Jun 14, 2020, 11:31:13 AMPrefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?Wasn't that the final version?My issue was more the performance.
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 14, 2020, 05:26:34 PMSpeaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 15, 2020, 09:00:31 AMQuote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 14, 2020, 05:26:34 PMSpeaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.Assuming you're talking the Fifield monster, that's a better way of putting it. I definitely prefer the design of the CGI version, but I don't believe they ever actually finished work on the CG effect.
Quote from: Local Trouble on Feb 15, 2018, 11:38:57 AMI bet even rocks hate Fifield.