Quote from: Weasel on Nov 24, 2007, 09:19:54 PM
It's so f**king repetitive though. Every thread that somewhat mentions a predalien spawns into some discussion such as this. I'm not pretending. You can't just pick and choose what films are canon and which are not.
As this is not a film exclusively based in the '
Alien' or '
Predator' series, it's always been a possibility that any released like this
could be dismissed as not canon.
I'd rather they not be, because it's easier that way, but if we see things which go against the rules set down in those films, there's not much point in trying to pretend it all fits together.
QuoteIf H.R. Giger had invented the puking method everyone would flip shit and call it creative thinking.
Not necessarily. Look at what happens when we debate Giger's designs for '
Alien 3'. Most people seem to agree that, while very artistic, they would not have suited it very well.
By contrast, what ended up being portrayed in the later film, '
Species', was actually a lot more biomechanical than those designs were.
QuoteJust because you don't like something automatically doesn't make it not canon. My statements simply...states that it's getting kind of boring hearing the same people argument the same thing
Then don't read them.
Most of the debates occur because someone tries to say Method X fits in perfectly well with canon, only for people with more knowledge of one of the relevant films to have to point out all the reasons why it doesn't seem to, all over again.
QuoteThis is like arguing over the ALIENS queen. You know absolutely nothing about about how Xenomorphs work in different bodies. And the fact that predators are probably massively different in biology than us.
The Queen fits with egg transformation: Queens are more efficient, with egging potentially being a way for the ordinary adults to
get a Queen facehugger.
The 'different bodies' thing doesn't work, as every Alien is
still just another alien, regardless of what superficial traits it might have enherited for the eternal features. As for Predator biology, that has nothing to do with any of this, unless you are of the mind PREdator DNA could have given them the oral thing, in which case you have to ask yourself why those hatched from humans and canines don't have a massive phallus on their crotch.
And hey, nobody's saying oral, in an d of itself, is necessarily a bad idea. They're saying that doing it to implant chestbursters goes against what was depicted on screen in '
Alien' - especially with the director now saying they feel the extended versions of the films are canon, in their own view.
Combining that with the fact that this 'Predalien' is meant to be an ordinary Alien transforming into a Queen, plus the admission of there already being "many" facehuggers already breeding in humans and... It does not bode well for trying to make what we know about it fit logically with all of the other films.