Quote from: Major Alan Schaefer on Oct 31, 2007, 02:06:21 AM
Not as harsh as one might think. The Runner in A3 wasen't consistant nor the Queen in Aliens
If you'll read some of my posts on my other threads, you'll see that I judged A3 negatively for its inconsistencies as well.
As for the Queen in A2: Alien1
forced us to ask ourselves where these eggs came from. Providing an answer to an already existing question is not inconsistent.
This regurgitation idea (while I am not as strongly opposed to it as most people seem to be) answers a "question" that we never asked ourselves. It also forces us to rationalize the apparent contradictions to A3, and A:R, which are already canon.
No one was wondering what a "young" queen would be like, because we saw a Queen in A:R that had been raised to maturity in captivity, and there was nothing that would have led us to believe that there was a stage between "burster" and "mature queen".
And the "young Queen" explanation is crap anyway. How the hell are they going to work that into that movie? Have any of these characters seen a grown queen? NO. So no one is going to be able to explain what is going on to the audience.
I imagine it will go something like this:
Man: OMFG what is that thing? Its bigger than the others! And it just threw up on Bill!
Woman: It must be their leader. Or something. Like ...a queen! But maybe its not fully grown yet.
Man: Sure ... that makes sense. What will it do when it does grow up?
Woman: Well, I would imagine it lays eggs.
Man: Its all so obvious!