Quote from: SiL on May 09, 2007, 08:33:08 PM
Quote from: YutaniDitch on May 09, 2007, 10:21:17 AM
This insertion dates from 2003 and nowhere else was this ever used or implied...
Alan Dean Foster's novelisation. The Book of Alien. Giger's Alien.
Quoteit still doesn't acknowledge why wasn't this EVER mentioned in the following sequels if it was just deleted from the final cut for pacing reasons...
Because Cameron felt the life-cycle was too complex to explain in a short amount of time to a mass-audience, so he dumbed it down to a Queen. This was twofold - A) It allowed him to show the lifecycle in one shot, and B) He got his bitch-fight at the end.
Alien3 was going to use it, but the entire sequence was scrapped due to budgetary reasons.
QuoteIt is because it was a too recent introduction that is never backed by any info in the sequels or official word from Ridley Scott and Dan O'Bannon...
1979 was almost thirty years ago; hardly recent. It was covered in materials of the time, it's right there in the script - And it's hardly vague - the novelisation kept it, and there was clearly enough coverage of the details of it from the people working on the film for audiences to bitch about it in '86 after Aliens came out and changed it.
To you it's a recent edition - To fans from the beginning, it's as old as the film itself.
Quotewith no confirmation of this by Ridley or O'Bannon...
Region 1 commentary, Ridley Scott remarks they're turning into eggs. Dissecting Aliens: Terror in Space has him and various other people saying they're turning into eggs. The Book of Alien mentions they're turning into eggs. Giger's Alien, from the notes he got from O'Bannon, says they were turning into eggs.
QuoteBut if you have any official link that explains this, it would be appreciated...
Regrettably, my information is not on the internet, but in books.
Quotethat is not stating, more just comparing, to me...
Almost exactly. It's called reading comprehension.
Quotelooks like Yutani's got you boys covered......
His argument is built entirely on ignorance - He's hardly got us covered.
SiL, first of all, it is irrelevant what was or was not in the novels or art books... Giger's concept was dropped by Jim Cameron - FACT... Nowhere else in the Quarilogy was it ever mentioned, used or implied - FACT...
Like some of you say, movies are the CANON..not money-driven novels... And though this was Giger's design, it is not explained or even directly said iin ANY of the movies...
So, I ask you, which to you is CANON, the movies or the novels..? Same with AVP, are the movies canon or the games, novels, etc...?
It is irrelevant if in a novel it is said this or that, what matters is what makes the silver screen, AND what is satisfactorily explained on it... The original pyramid where the eggs were was never explained nor ever made it into the screen... Do you consider it canon because it was in the O'Bannon script...?
And, SiL, stop trying to offend people, it is not helping you make your point across... I never offended you, and your opinion is only that...an opinion... Try to respect your fellow posters, OK... and they will, in return, respect you...