Michael Fassbender and Dosmetic Violence

[Scorpio]

"However the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal that the woman who is threatening the 32-year-old Irishman's reputation and, indeed, his very livelihood, is herself a woman with a troubled and somewhat seedy past. The model has had a string of lovers including an internet porn baron and a married man; she has children by different fathers, her first as an 18-year-old; and her early years were spent posing for 'erotic' lesbian pictures,"

Victim shaming, the publication went on to state, "Nor was it the only instance of domestic violence in Miss Andrews's chequered past. Indeed, much of her history seems to suggest that, either she suffers from a persecution complex—or else she genuinely brings out the worst in men."

Andrews told the Daily Beast that she has never been involved in X-rated work or modeling, only posing for swimsuit and lingerie campaigns.

She also confirmed that in 2005 she obtained a restraining order against her boyfriend Seth Warshavsky, an Internet porn magnate, after he choked and attacked her in front of her then 6-year-old child.

https://www.irishcentral.com/news/michael-fassbender-s-ex-claims-actor-attacked-her-twice-broke-her-nose-burst-an-ovarian-cyst

If the above is accurate, girl doesn't sound legit to me.

[SM]

That's called a 'victim-shaming smear'.

Bottom line about all this is that women (not just women, though) have to stop being victims

And that is possibly the most utterly f**king moronic thing you've ever posted.

"Suddenly"?

Decades of men abusing their power and you whinge about them being finally called out?

Finally? Many people of power have been called out before everyone decided to jump on this band wagon. I still believe in innocent until proven guilty.

Fortunately Scorpio's post make your drivel seem a little less dense.

[Rudiger]

Bottom line about all this is that women (not just women, though) have to stop being victims

Wow. I think we should all stop and take a moment to marvel at the sheer idiocy of that statement. I've had the misfortune to read a lot of dumb shit on the internet, but that is gold medal standard.

[Scorpio]

I don't understand what's so wrong about that, I am trying to say that women have to act as well to stop themselves being victims, not blaming them at all.  Since they are adults capable of making rational decisions.

But this is a sensitive topic and people do tend to blow things out of proportion.

[SM]

'She should've made a rational decision to get out the way of my fist'.

What you're saying is dumber than dogshit, and you really should stop while your behind.

[Rudiger]

I don't understand what's so wrong about that, I am trying to say that women have to act as well to stop themselves being victims, not blaming them at all.  Since they are adults capable of making rational decisions.

But this is a sensitive topic and people do tend to blow things out of proportion.

If you don't understand what's so wrong about your comments, I'd respectfully suggest that this subject isn't for you.

[Scorpio]

Tell us where you stand then, instead of acting triggered at the slightest comment that might offend political correctness.  Even though it isn't.

[SiL]

It's not as simple as that, SiL.

But that's what you said. You said women need to stop being victims. I was agreeing with you -- it's absolutely their fault for not getting out of the way of their abuse partner's rages, and it's frankly astounding they haven't realised this yet. They should do more.

[Scorpio]

It's really about how someone views women, SiL.  I don't have any particular view on women, there are all kinds.

It seems to me like you view them a certain way, perhaps this is more harmful than you would like to admit?

[SiL]

I really don't understand. I'm agreeing with everything you're saying, and you're trying to turn it against me? Are you bipolar? Are you just being contrarian for the sake of it?

[Scorpio]

I could've sworn you were being sarcastic.  My mistake.

[SiL]

No, for real, I'm totally with you on the victim blaming, dude.

[Scorpio]

And how do you determine who is and who isn't a victim?

[SiL]

Well when one person chokes and beats another, the person who was choked and beaten is the victim of the attack. And it's their fault for being a victim. They should have not been a victim instead, then the whole situation would solve itself.

[Scorpio]

We don't even know all the facts around this case.  There's been no trial or confession. 

Why are you so quick to believe media hyperbole?