Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 15, 2014, 08:45:08 AM"It kinda does"
-HuDaFuK
Said by you.
:p
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 14, 2014, 08:51:31 AM
Main argument and then some stuff
When did I ever say it did?
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 12, 2014, 08:37:15 AMQuote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 12, 2014, 06:41:40 AMYes actually, the first film has Eggmorphing to explain its eggs.
No it doesn't.
Eggmorphing didn't exist in the franchise until the Director's Cut in 2003.
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 14, 2014, 04:27:04 AM99% and probably? Unless virtually nobody read anything about the film in magazines. Contrary to popular belief, people in the United States can indeed read magazine articles about films they like. Especially when it's a hit and a good movie too. :p
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 14, 2014, 04:27:04 AM"You can't help them....right now they're being coccooned like the others."
-Ripley.
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 14, 2014, 04:27:04 AMAnd no, no, and no again, eggmorphing does not contradict a queen producing eggs.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 13, 2014, 08:48:23 AMQuote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 13, 2014, 03:16:42 AMIt existed if you bothered to read any of the behind the scenes magazines at the time that talked about the deleted scene. :p
Which 99% of the people who saw the film probably didn't.Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 13, 2014, 03:16:42 AMIt also doesn't contradict any established (theatrically shown)canon.
It kinda does. If Ripley had seen that, she'd at least pipe up and say something when the Marines stumble into the Hive on LV-426. Instead she's silent and looks genuinely dumbfounded.
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 13, 2014, 03:16:42 AMIt existed if you bothered to read any of the behind the scenes magazines at the time that talked about the deleted scene. :p
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 13, 2014, 03:16:42 AMIt also doesn't contradict any established (theatrically shown)canon.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 12, 2014, 08:37:15 AMIt existed if you bothered to read any of the behind the scenes magazines at the time that talked about the deleted scene. :p
No it doesn't.
Eggmorphing didn't exist in the franchise until the Director's Cut in 2003.
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 12, 2014, 06:41:40 AMYes actually, the first film has Eggmorphing to explain its eggs.
Quote from: Nightlord
An alien morphed into one
Quote from: Nightlord
...or if you want to go the royal facehugger route..
Quote from: Nightlord
..first alien made one of those
Quote from: NightlordJust because the source of the eggs isn't shown doesn't mean there's a problem, there's no source for the eggs in Alien within the context of just that movie either.
Quote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 11, 2014, 09:56:20 PMAn alien morphed into one, or if you want to go the royal facehugger route then the first alien made one of those.Quote from: Nightlord on Nov 11, 2014, 09:17:38 PMQuote from: thecaffeinatedone on Nov 11, 2014, 08:49:16 PMWhat?Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 10, 2014, 12:45:31 PMQuote from: Kelgaard on Nov 10, 2014, 12:43:02 PMSo I'm guessing now that egg morphing is heavily implied? Since we see a hive and numerous eggs but no queen?
Not really. A Queen is just as plausible.
i.e. We never see explicit evidence of either.
Why is a Queen just as plausible when there's only one Alien? :pSpoiler
There's a load of aliens, at least seven appear if you count the group shot towards the end and the guy you get rid of.[close]
:p That's not what I meant. I meant how did it go fromSpoiler
only one alien to being a hive with multiple aliens? How did this mystery queen appear?[close]
Quote from: Kelgaard on Nov 12, 2014, 03:50:23 AMBusy creating the hive perhaps.
Another question is why weren't those other aliens running around earlier? Why was it just the one?
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Nov 10, 2014, 12:45:31 PMThat's kind of a shame.Quote from: Kelgaard on Nov 10, 2014, 12:43:02 PMSo I'm guessing now that egg morphing is heavily implied? Since we see a hive and numerous eggs but no queen?
Not really. A Queen is just as plausible.
i.e. We never see explicit evidence of either.