Started by Corporal Hicks, Oct 30, 2015, 01:45:05 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Dec 07, 2015, 08:34:46 AMI think the best case scenario here is that Scott and Blomkamp bounce really well off each other. I think it's good to have a guiding hand looking over the franchise but we really need Scott to be on point. What they both really need is a strong writer to work alongside them.
Quote from: windebieste on Dec 31, 2015, 09:35:47 PMLet's see the response you get from fans when you suggest to them 'The Force Awakens' should be retconned because Han Solo died. It was just a dream and he should get the ending he deserves.This will be good.-Windebieste.
Quote from: predxeno on Dec 31, 2015, 08:24:17 PMConsidering how Star Wars Episode VII is also a film for fans and its subsequent success, would Blomkamp's Alien V really be that bad of an idea?
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Dec 31, 2015, 09:43:08 PMQuote from: windebieste on Dec 31, 2015, 09:35:47 PMLet's see the response you get from fans when you suggest to them 'The Force Awakens' should be retconned because Han Solo died. It was just a dream and he should get the ending he deserves.This will be good.-Windebieste.LOL! Touche!
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Jan 01, 2016, 09:30:23 PMQuote from: Perfect-Organism on Dec 31, 2015, 09:43:08 PMQuote from: windebieste on Dec 31, 2015, 09:35:47 PMLet's see the response you get from fans when you suggest to them 'The Force Awakens' should be retconned because Han Solo died. It was just a dream and he should get the ending he deserves.This will be good.-Windebieste.LOL! Touche!Ok, this is OT, but there are at least 2 significant differences to consider between Newt / Hicks and Han Solo's deaths.1. The death of Han Solo was an integral part of the Star Wars 7 film whereas the death of Newt / Hicks was done in a sleight of hand manner in the opening credits of the film as if the characters did not have any value. Han Solo had a "good death" paying full respect to the fans' emotional investment, while Newt / Hicks were disposed of like trash, thereby insulting the fans' emotional investment.3. Resultingly the fan response to Alien 3 was terrible, while the fan response to Star Wars was terrific. There is no need to worry about retconning a film that had a terrific fan response. Questionable, fluffy story notwithstanding.
Quote from: predxeno on Jan 02, 2016, 05:19:27 AMOut of curiosity, how many people watch the "director's cut"? I get the feeling only the hardcore Alien/sci-fi fans watched it while more casual moviegoers are happy to settle for the theatrical release that's always been available.
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Jan 02, 2016, 06:39:35 AMIt was Aliens that brought them into the theaters. Yes it could have been a commercial success with a lot of people walking out of the theaters being like, "what the f--k did I just see?"