Declassified: US Imperialism, Terror, and Support for Tyranny

Started by Horhey, Apr 12, 2011, 09:44:14 PM

Author
Declassified: US Imperialism, Terror, and Support for Tyranny (Read 42,536 times)

Ghost Rider

Quote from: Horhey on Apr 14, 2011, 04:21:11 PM
Before I continue with the Obama team's activities I wanted to give a little backstory on US history of neo-colonialism in Venezezuela mostly from the 2002-2011 period. Venezuela, not Saudi Arabia, is our #1 supplier of patroleum. They could possibly have the second largest energy reserves in the world. The Citgo gas stations are owned by Venezuela.

2002 US Military Coup in Venezuela

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0lcnNb_t7I#

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7c6W_QctQ8#

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwBNpFOyPPo#

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdKkM12YlGI#

General Peter Pace, the Commander in Chief of the US militaries Southern Command outlined these concerns clearly when he spoke of the three vital US national interests that guide US post-Cold War policy in South America. Some of the vital national interests are the following:

QuoteA common misperception is that the US is completely dependent upon the Middle East for our nation's petroleum needs. However, our largest single supplier of petroleum is actually Venezuela - a country that provides 15% to 19% of our imported oil in any given month.

Another vital interest is continued stability required for access to markets in the US SouthCom AOR, which is critical to the continued economic expansion and prosperity of the United States.

In sum, US vital interests in Latin America are the unhindered access to Latin America's oil, the bolstering of pro-US governments or the overthrow of governments that might threaten US-run exploitative economic programs (what is called 'stability' in official discourse), and open access to strategic land and water corridors.

In Venezuela 2002, the US backed a military coup against the democratically elected government of Hugo Chavez (contrary to what you may believe, Venezuela has a SUBSTANTIVE democracy) that briefly removed him from power for reasons explained in the public record..

QuoteCURRENT AND PROJECTED NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES

Senator Roberts:

Let me ask you another question on assessment of the threat to the United States in our own hemisphere. Venezuela does supply a great majority of our energy, not to mention trade--it is Latin and Central America, or what we refer to as the 31 countries of the Southern Command.

I'm very worried about that, more particularly in regards to Venezuela and a fellow name Hugo Chavez .I would appreciate your assessment. If you could underscore that a little bit, the threat to the U.S. within our own hemisphere .

CIA Director George Tenet:

Sir, obviously, Venezuela is important because they're the third-largest supplier of petroleum. I would say that Mr. Chavez--and the State Department may say this--probably doesn't have the interests of the United States at heart.

"Democracy" - as the US defines the term: Societies that are open to U.S. economic penetration and political control.

Secretary of State Colin Powell added that:

QuoteWe have been concerned with some of the actions of Venezuelan President Chavez, and his understanding of what a democratic system is all about.

The New York Times noted that:

QuoteMr. Chávez has made himself very unpopular with the Bush administration with his mouthing of revolutionary slogans -- and by threatening the independence of Venezuela's state-owned oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela, the third-largest foreign supplier of American oil.

Which is a euphimism for strange and unnacceptable ideas of asserting sovereign control over our resources in their own lands. The indegenous populations have the tendancy to try to use "our raw materials" for their own purposes. Now that's a conspiracy that has to be stopped!

How then has the US responded to a reformist government in Venezuela?

According to the U.S. State Department's Office of Inspector General report:

QuoteIt is clear that NED [the National Endowment for Democracy], Department of Defense (DOD), and other U.S. assistance programs provided training, institution building, and other support to individuals and organizations understood to be actively involved in the brief ouster of the Chavez government.

In an article titled "Venezuela coup Linked to Bush Team", the Gaurdian reports:

QuoteSpecialists in the 'dirty wars' of the Eighties encouraged the plotters who tried to topple President Chavez

The failed coup in Venezuela was closely tied to senior officials in the US government, The Observer has established. They have long histories in the 'dirty wars' of the 1980s, and links to death squads working in Central America at that time.

Washington's involvement in the turbulent events that briefly removed left-wing leader Hugo Chavez from power last weekend resurrects fears about US ambitions in the hemisphere.

The Bush administration immediately endorsed the new government under businessman Pedro Carmona. More than 100 people died in events before and after the coup.

Now officials at the Organisation of American States and other diplomatic sources, talking to The Observer, assert that the US administration was not only aware the coup was about to take place, but had sanctioned it, presuming it to be destined for success.

Furthermore, in an artcle entitled "American navy 'helped Venezuelan coup'", the Guardian reports:

QuoteIt is also alleged that the US navy aided the abortive coup which took place in Venezuela on April 11 with intelligence from its vessels in the Caribbean. Evidence is also emerging of US financial backing for key participants in the coup.

In the past year, the United States has channeled hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to US and Venezuelan groups opposed to Mr Chavez, including the labour group whose protests sparked off the coup. The funds were provided by the National Endowment for Democracy, a nonprofit agency created and financed by the US Congress.

The April 6th SEIB document further reveals that the CIA was aware of exactly how the coup would be engineered:

QuoteConditions Ripening for Coup Attempt:

Dissident military factions, including some disgruntled senior officers and a group of radical junior officers, are stepping up efforts to organize a coup against President Chavez, possibly as early as this month - The level of detail in the reported plans targets Chavez and 10 other senior officials for arrest -

To provoke military action, the plotters may try to exploit unrest stemming from opposition demonstrations slated for later this month or ongoing strikes at the state-owned oil company PDVSA.

James Petras, a professor at New York State University, who was in Chile in the early 1970s and has studied the Washington's overthrow of the Allende government, says that:

QuoteThe IMF and financial institutions are fabricating a familiar crisis. The tactics used are very similar to those used in Chile. Civilians are used to create a feeling of chaos, and a false picture of Chavez as a dictator is established, then the military is incited to make a coup for the sake of the country.

The fascist US-puppet regime immediatly established a totalitarian state the day they siezed power.

The New York Times reports:

QuoteThe Central Intelligence Agency was aware that dissident military officers and opposition figures in Venezuela were planning a coup against President Hugo Chávez in 2002, newly declassified intelligence documents show.

Taken into custody by dissident military officers, Mr. Chávez was spirited out of Caracas while an interim government led by Pedro Carmona, a Caracas businessman, took power.

The new government dissolved Congress and the Supreme Court and hunted down Mr. Chávez's ministers.

According to US Embassy Caracas cables, Pedro Carmona was considered by the US State Department as:

Quotea highly regarded and influential business leader who has consistently played a critical role in advancing US commercial interests in Venezuela.

And later, once the Fedecamaras-CTV alliance had been forged in December 2001, as:

Quotethe right man for the right time in Venezuela.

The State Department added that:

QuoteCarmona delivered calm and statesman-like speeches .

In contrast, Hugo Chavez was normally referred to as somebody who "did not have the interests of the United States at heart" and "a danger for the stability of the country and Latin America."

Immediatly after the coup, Thomas Dawson, the IMF External Relations Director, stated that:

Quotewe stand ready to assist the new administration in whatever manner they find suitable.

Once Chavez had been rescued by the military and returned to power after popular mass street demonstrations, Miguel Bustamante-Madriz, a member of Chavez's cabinet argued:

QuoteAmerica can't let us stay in power. We are the exception to the new globalization order. If we succeed, we are an example to all the Americas.

A Bush administration spokesman stated quite bluntly that:

QuoteHe [Chavez] was democratically elected, [but] legitimacy is something that is conferred not just by a majority of the voters, however.

The New York Times reports:

Quoteadministration officials did not hide their dismay at his restora tion.

Asked whether the administration now recognizes Mr. Chávez as Venezuela's legitimate president, one administration official replied, ''He was democratically elected,'' then added, ''Legitimacy is something that is conferred not just by a majority of the voters, however.''

Elected governments must have the Mafia-Don's blessing to gain "legitimacy."

You actually think that the US is trying to get an empire?

Sharp Sticks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSvS2ev-4_E#

And come on Rider. You don't need to quote the whole internet.

Ghost Rider

Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Apr 14, 2011, 04:23:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSvS2ev-4_E#

And come on Rider. You don't need to quote the whole internet.

My bad. I just didn't want to miss the details.

Sharp Sticks

Quote from: Ghost Rider on Apr 14, 2011, 04:24:27 PM
My bad. I just didn't want to miss the details.

It's kind of hard to miss. I'm getting stack overflow popups every time I open this page.

Ghost Rider

Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Apr 14, 2011, 04:26:00 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Apr 14, 2011, 04:24:27 PM
My bad. I just didn't want to miss the details.

It's kind of hard to miss. I'm getting stack overflow popups every time I open this page.

Ok, I'll stop doing that. Its kind of a habit.

Horhey

Horhey

#110
Carter administration officials: "our military assistance will help strengthen the Army's key role in reforms."  :o

Of course, the Carter adminstration ignored the Archbishop's plea and sent more military aid to it's death squad forces.

QuoteForeign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriations for 1982:AID operating expenses

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations and Related Agencies (1981-1987):

Congress approved $5.7 million in US military aid for the repressive junta of El Salvador. Despite continued human rights violations, including 220 persons killed last week, Congress proposes to send an additional $5.5 million in military aid us part of the Fiscal Year 1981 Foreign Aid Appropriations Act.



Critics of the aid charged that:

Quoteit would legitimate what has become dictatorial violence and that political power in El Salvador lay with old-line military leaders in government positions who practice a policy of 'reform with repression.'

A prominant Catholic spokesman insisted that:

QuoteAny military aid you send to El Salvador ends up in the hands of the military and paramilitary rightest groups who are themselves at the root of the problems of the country.

Carter administration officials countered by arguing that:

QuoteWe believe that the October l5 program, which is now being implemented by the Revolutionary Governing Junta, offers the best chance for social change, political liberalization and respect for human rights in El Salvador.
:o

A Pentagon spokesman told Congress that:

Quoteour military assistance will help strengthen the Army's key role in reforms.
:o

-A statement that would have made Orwell cringe. The results were predictable.

Ghost Rider

Quote from: Horhey on Apr 14, 2011, 04:47:34 PM
Quote from: Eidotemit on Apr 14, 2011, 04:08:04 PM
There had better be a point coming, because so far there isn't one. Well, beyond demonstrating a lesson on how to strain information to tie it to other bits of loosely or completely unrelated history. So, if you please, finish copy-pasting and get on with it.

Also, I, as I assume most involved in this thread, know of CAFTA (the same goes for globalization, and the failed Alliance for Progress). I also disagree with it (and NAFTA) as many in America, even those in "Washington," do (including Obama who voted "no" on CAFTA).

Don't be condescending about things that are fairly common knowledge; especially when you don't seem to fully understand them.

Apparently it's not. The "Alliance for Progress" was much more than a failed program. It was a program of exploitation and mass murder of organizing peasants, Church Clergy that aided the poor, healthcare workers, human rights activists, journalists, trade unionists, teachers, by Death Squads organized and propped up by the United States. Obama is a hardcore so called "free trader". He didnt stand by his vote when he became President. Far from it. Ill get to that later..


Tell me that you aren't serious. You think the US is a people of butchers all of a sudden? I'm thinking that you don't even understand what you are saying.

Valaquen

I don't think he's said anything about American citizens being butchers. You get governments and then you have people. Attacking the former is not an attack on the latter.

Horhey

Horhey

#113
MASSACRE AT ARCHBISHOP'S FUNERAL by US-Death Squads

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EN6LWdqcyuc#



BBC News reports:

QuoteOscar Arnulfo Romero's assassination focused the attention of the world on the scale of repression in the small Central American republic. And at his funeral a few days later, people around the globe saw on their own television screens the kind of political terror that had been unleashed to stop growing demands for change in one of the most unequal societies in Latin America. Tens of thousands of mourners who had gathered for Romero's funeral Mass in front of the cathedral in San Salvador were filmed fleeing in terror as army gunners on the rooftops around the square opened fire.

The roots of the violence lay in El Salvador's history. For the 50 years before Romero's death, the country had been run by an alliance between wealthy coffee planters and the military: politics was left to the officers, business to the oligarchy. The arrangement lasted until the 1970s when the pressure of population and a growing middle class produced a coherent challenge - not least from activists within the Catholic Church.

The massacre was carried out by the US-organized, trained, armed, advised, and financed National Police and National Guard.

Thousands of peasants and urban poor took part in a commemorative mass a decade later, along with many foreign bishops, but the US was notable by its absence. The Salvadoran Church formally proposed Romero for sainthood. All of this passed with scarcely a mention in the country that funded and trained Romero's assassins. The New York Times, the "newspaper of record," published no editorial on the assassination when it occurred or in the years that followed, and no editorial or news report on the commemoration.

Ghost Rider

I think I'm just going to give up now.

Purebreedalien

*Sees thread*

Hmm...

*Sees huge posts and conspiracy theories*


f**k that shit!

*leaves*

Horhey

Horhey

#116
The Rio Sumpul Massacre

On March 7, 1980, two weeks before the assassination, a state of siege had been instituted in El Salvador, and the war against the peasentry and the Church began in force with continued US support and involvement. The first major attack was a big massacre at the Rio Sumpul, a coordinated military operation of the Honduran and Salvadoran armies in which at least 300 people were butchered. Infants were cut to pieces with machetes, and women were tortured and drowned. Pieces of bodies were found in the river for days afterwards. There were church observers, so the information came out immediately, but the mainstream US media didn't think it was worth reporting. 



Peasants were the main victims of this war, along with labor organizers, students, priests or anyone suspected of working for the interests of the people. As a result approximately 35,000 refugees, mostly women and children, had been living on the Honduran border in conditions of poverty, starvation and disease, as reported by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

These people were attempting to escape the regular raids of the Salvadorian army and the government's paramilitaries, ORDEN. The latter would cross the border to attack the refugee camps, which had formed out of the population attempting to escape domestic state-terror.

The UN Truth Commission report on El Salvador concluded that:

QuoteOn 14 May 1980, units of Military Detachment No. 1, the National Guard and the paramilitary Organización Nacional Democrática (ORDEN) deliberately killed at least 300 non-combatants, including women and children, who were trying to flee to Honduras across the Sumpul river beside the hamlet of Las Aradas, Department of Chalatenango. The massacre was made possible by the cooperation of the Honduran armed forces, who prevented the Salvadorian villagers from landing on the other side.

After visiting these border regions in January 1981 on a fact-finding mission, a U.S. congressional delegation submitted a report to Congress. The report provided extensive documentation of the U.S.-backed Salvadorian death squads systematic atrocities against its civilian population, noting that:

QuoteThe refugees describe what appears to be a systematic campaign conducted by the security forces of El Salvador to deny any rural base for guerrilla operations in the north.

By terrorizing and depopulating villages in the region they have sought to isolate the guerrillas and create problems of logistics and food supply... The Salvadorean method of 'drying up the ocean' involves, according to those who have fled from its violence, a combination of murder, torture, rape, the burning of crops in order to create starvation conditions, and a program of general terrorism and harassment.

The report then presents some sample interviews in which refugees describe the bombing and burning of villages by the army, mass murder of fleeing civilians, shooting of defenseless peasants from helicopters, and extraordinary brutality (e.g.: mutilation; decapitation):

QuoteShe personally saw children around the age of eight being raped, and then they would take their bayonets and make mincemeat of them. With their guns they would shoot at their faces. 'She said, "Even going to the mountainside, No, they haven't done any of those kinds of things, but the Army would cut people up and put soap and coffee in their stomachs as a mocking. They would slit the stomach of a pregnant woman and take the child out, as if they were taking were taking eggs out of an iguana. That is what I saw.

With regard to the guerrillas, refugees report:

QuoteWe don't complain about them at all, they haven't done any of those kind of things, it's the military that is doing this. Only the military. The popular organization isn't doing any of this.

As for the military:

QuoteThey were killing everybody. They were looking for people to kill - that's what they were doing.

The report concludes that:

QuoteThe United States should suspend military sales, training and assistance to the security forces of El Salvador on the grounds that those forces are operating independent of responsible civilian control, and are conducting a systematic campaign of terrorism directed against segments of their own population.

In fact, the government is effectively under right-wing military control, the reformist officers having been driven out of the junta.



The U.N. Truth Commission report concluded that:

QuoteSalvadoran exiles living in Miami helped administer death squad activities between 1980 and 1983, with apparently little attention from the U.S. government. Such use of American territory for acts of terrorism abroad should be investigated and never allowed to be repeated.

Unfortunately, the Salvadoran military junta and death squads were also in receipt of a:

QuoteCarter program of support for repression and massacre in El Salvador, while attempting to exploit the tragedy, in the manner of earlier years, for the purposes of their domestic programs of militarization and alms for the wealthy.

The New York Times has further recorded the aftermath of the U.S. operation, noting that:

Quotebecause the United States armed and financed the army whose brutality sent them into exile, few Salvadoreans were able to obtain the refugee status granted to Cubans, Vietnamese, Kuwaitis, and other nationalities at various times. The conflict lasted from 1979 until 1992, during which more than 70,000 people were killed in El Salvador, most of them by the American-backed army and the death squads it in turn supported, thus forcing many people here to flee to the United States where they have often been denied asylum.


Purebreedalien

Quote from: Horhey on Apr 14, 2011, 08:43:24 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Apr 14, 2011, 08:31:03 PM
*Sees thread*

Hmm...

*Sees huge posts and conspiracy theories*


f**k that shit!

*leaves*

Point out what you say are conspiracy theories please.

Oh, y'know, most of the stuff I skimmed through without reading properly. Basically TL ; DR.

Horhey

Horhey

#118
The Assault on the University in San Salvador

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC31ysZtLvM#ws

In June 1980 the university in San Salvador was attacked and destroyed by the army. Many faculty and students were killed and much of the university facilities were simply demolished.

From the Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations: Americas:

QuoteThe university was stormed and ransacked by government troops on 26 June 1980; at least 50 students and the rector were killed, and the university did not reopen for several years.



In November the political opposition was massacred. Meanwhile the independent media were also destroyed.

New York Times journalist, Raymond Bonner noted that:

QuoteA thirty-five-year- old priest, Manuel Antonio Reyes Monico, was picked up by government troops, and later shot. During his homily on October 26, 1980, Archbishop Rivera y Damas condemned the armed forces' "war of extermination and genocide against a defenseless civilian population."

Two months later:

QuoteDuarte hailed the killers for "valiant service alongside the people against subversion" as he was sworn in as President of the junta in an effort to provide it with legitimacy after the murder of four American churchwomen.

The role of the "moderate" Duarte was to provide a fig leaf for the military rulers and ensure them a continuing flow of US funding after the armed forces had raped and murdered four churchwomen from the US. That had aroused some protest here; slaughtering Salvadorans is one thing, but raping and killing American nuns is a definite PR mistake. The media evaded and downplayed the story, following the lead of the Carter Administration and its investigative commission.

For the year of 1980, the Human Rights Office of the Archdiosese of San Salvador tabulated:

Quote8,062 murders of Persons of the popular and progressive sectors killed for political reasons, not in military confrontations, but as a result of military operations by the Army, Security Forces, and Paramilitary organizations coordinated by the High Command of the Armed Forces.

The independent newspapers in El Salvador, which might have reported these atrocities, had been destroyed. Although they were mainstream and pro-business, they were still too undisciplined for the military's taste. The problem was taken care of in 1980-81, when the editor of one was murdered by the security forces; the other fled into exile. As usual, these events were considered too insignificant to merit more than a few words in US newspapers.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post assured us that:

Quotethere is no real argument that most of the estimated 10000 political fatalities in 1980 were victims of government forces or irregulars associated with them."

Though it was quietly conceded that at the time, officials of the Carter administration were informing the media that:

Quotesecurity forces were responsible for 90 percent of the atrocities, not uncontrollable right wing bands.

As the press had been reporting.

Purebreedalien

If I knew who Alex Jones was, maybe that'd help, but being that I'm not American, and therefore, don't really care, I don't see why I'm still posting here. :D

Later!

AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News