The plumage configuration fits with what we know about dromaeosaurs (see
Zhenyuanlong in particular) - pennaceous fans on the wings and posterior tail, downy fluff over most of the body, bare or scaled feet and frontal snout. There's a lot of room for artistic interpretation with dinofuzz - you could draw the various elements as shorter or longer, smoother or shaggier/ruffled, and obviously there's a lot of scope to explore with colour. Emily Willoughby likes to convey a particularly avian look in those respects, but her work is extremely well-researched and generally accurate.
Dromaeosaur wings were probably inherited from a flying/gliding ancestor, which is indicated by the half-moon-shaped wrist bones that allowed them to flex the hand back nearly against the forearm, their very close relationship with other fliers like avialans and scansoriopterygids, and the fact that the mostly-flying microraptorines are among the more basal known members of the family.
The wings weren't vestigial at all on the flightless species though, so yes, they had some non-flying benefit. They were definitely used for brooding nests - the parent sat in the middle of the nest, with the wing feathers covering the eggs to regulate their temperature. We know they did this, because fossils have been found of brooding dinosaurs.
Moving into more speculative territory, they also could have flapped the wings to increase jump height, or propel them faster and more easily up inclined surfaces (which chicks do today). When held horizontally, they could have had a parachute effect to allow them to drop from greater heights (basal oviraptorosaur Protarchaeopteryx is thought to have done this), and yup, could have been used for a balancing effect when running or standing on struggling prey.