Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 08:36:26 PM
Quote from: SiL on Oct 26, 2007, 08:32:46 PM
Quote from: Dragonblaster on Oct 26, 2007, 08:29:24 PM
Did you even read what I wrote ?
Yees, and if it doesn't lead to egg morphing it's a continuity error. We don't know what happened to Lambert, but we have absolutely no reason to assume it was this.
We've never seen what the phase of reproduction was between a young queen and a fully aged egg laying queen. Continuity has not only been maintained, but expanded upon.
As others have pointed out, we very much have seen precisely that. '
Alien 3' makes it clear that Queens are born with the multiple limbs and crest (plus legs, if we go by the model), while '
Alien Resurrection' has an unambiguous scientific statement of the process the Queen goes through.
Are we seriously going to believe those Auriga scientists never put a live animal in with the young Queen, to see what would happen?
Heck, they had Ripley 7 going free for spare parts, if nothing else.
I don't have problems with adding to the Alien, but claims of things never being seen, when they have been, do not reflect well.
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 08:50:06 PM
Quote from: Dragonblaster on Oct 26, 2007, 08:48:54 PM
I like how this might show what actually happened to Lambert.
And this is some kind of rape, too.
Oh, it is.
For the record, I think this new method fits perfectly well with the concept of what the Alien is. I think it could be creepy and horrific, if done right.
Unfortunately, I don't think it fits well with canon, because it's contradicting either how Queens are created or the purpose of egg transformation.
Previously, I was hoping we could say both methods could co-exist. Now that you've made it clear this is meant to be a creature maturing into a Queen, that seems to go out of the window.
It's a shame, because I'm one of the fans who's
trying to find a way to have this all fit together. I'm prepared to overlook certain things (people complaining about the number of teeth all Predators must somehow be dictated as being born with, for instance), but this isn't affording me much ambiguity.
Also, it's dangerously close to being derivative of many eighties B-movies, where we saw lots of '
Alien' clones showing creatures trying to reproduce by forcing something down a human being's mouth. It could look much better here, of course, but it's a fine line, in terms of presentation.
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 08:51:52 PM
Quote from: SiL on Oct 26, 2007, 08:49:41 PM
How does it show what happened to Lambert?
The Alien in that movie wasn't a young Queen.
Where do you think the queen came from in Aliens? Perhaps one of the domiant warriors became a young and queen and started the process. The simple fact is that it has never been shown before, so what are you arguing about?
I can say what James Cameron thought happened, if you want, because there was a very public letter.
The Jordans are seen calling for help. According to that story, help came and a search party was sent in. They arrived in time, because there was obviously some sort of vehcile powered by flight; hence "the landing grid" quote. By the time the colonial Marines arrived, this was probably placed back into the garage or whatever.
It's likely that a search party would have been sent, in order to get some clues about what was being dealt with. They have a strange organism they need to get off a guy's face. They don't know what it's doing. This extraterrestrial derelict craft/facility might have some information.
They then get hugged. One is a Queen.
The
alternative, which those such as myself and SM have favoured, is that the Jordan's creature got loose, did what happened in '
Alien', transformed someone into an egg, which then hatched into a Queen-laying facehugger.
Ordinary adults being able to transform into Queens is not necessary for either theory. It also
contradicts the purpose of having a natural Queen. What's the point of them, if any adult can simply split away from the nest and be one?
Quote from: SMJ on Oct 26, 2007, 08:53:13 PM
Well, if the queen didnt make some aliens to protect her first, something like, i dont know, a PREDATOR could just walk right in and blow her the f**k away. This makes sense to me. And I love it. I shall be scorned along with you then Colin lol.
That's why
the Queen lays a minefield of eggs. They
are her protection.
Remember how Ripley almost set one off? Instant death
and new young. That was what the scene in '
Aliens' was all about.
As shown with Kane, any freshly-impregnated host is going to be in no shape to fight in the immediate aftermath. If they show any signs of it, they'll be so groggy that the Queen would have more than enough time to commence battle.
Heck, she might even be able to order facehuggers to stay clamped until birth, if it seems necessary. Who's really to say?
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 08:54:39 PM
Quote from: SiL on Oct 26, 2007, 08:53:25 PM
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 08:51:52 PM
Where do you think the queen came from in Aliens? Perhaps one of the domiant warriors became a young and queen and started the process. The simple fact is that it has never been shown before, so what are you arguing about?
...Honestly, did you ever watch any movie made after Aliens? Queens are born Queens.
All I've seen is that these very complex creatures find a way to reproduce in strange and unique ways... hence them being Aliens and not simple bugs.
Which is precisely what egg transformation supplied us with. I'm seriously curious as to why you felt the need to do away with it. What was wrong with it? Time considerations? It only took a few hours. A simple cut away, complete with legend to indicate a brief passing of time, could have sufficed for that.
Especially if multiple hosts are taken for the very first abduction sequences.
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 09:04:50 PM
I guess Sil just wants simple Bugs.... how sad.
Colin, I know you probably feel a bit trod upon, today (and I don't mean that in a sarcastic way). You've just seen a massive negative public reaction to two of what should have been your flagship marks placed upon this franchise. Nevertheless, please try to understand that SiL is trying to articulate frustration at why you felt the need to do away with egg transformation. Can you please give us an answer, even if it was just down to personal preference?
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 09:09:37 PM
I love how something is "lame-ass" when you haven't seen it at all.
To clarify things, I'm willing to see it. I think it could be very atmospheric and I think that we can all agree that the Aliens
need a way to multiply in the absence of a Queen.
The problem is that it renders either natural Queens or egg transformation as obselete, when both those concepts came before this.
Quote from: SiL on Oct 26, 2007, 09:11:10 PM
The Queen's messed-up nature only came into play the end, after she'd gone through her natural reproductive process.
Correct. Human genetic contamination would not have accelerated the Queen's cycle. If anything, it would have delayed it. Her brief period of preparation for laying eggs might even have been slower than an ordinary Queen's would be.
Remember, she has to spend time hooking herself up and growing the beginnings of that sack,
then maturing eggs. Eggs aren't just created in a minute. We saw how many there were in the original Queen's body and she was laying them fairly slowly. Even if she was putting them out at a rate of two every minute, it would still take a long while for those undeveloped ones to fully mature and get shunted to the rear.
All of that time is what accounts for what the creature is supposedly doing.
Plus, any Queen candidate should realise how valuable it is and seal itself away, not go looking for threats to face it.
Quote from: SiL on Oct 26, 2007, 09:13:44 PM
But it still doesn't change the fact egg morphing would be infinitely better. It's slower and meaner and ickier. How does that make them like a bug? It doesn't. But it introduces a level of body-horror that you don't get these days.
That's why '
The Fly' works so well. Cronenberg understood that turning someone into what was basically a walking, evolving cancer, touches upon primal fears in the human mind, like nothing else can do.
Egg transformation is a disease, a cancer, yet, to quote '
Blade 2, a "cancer with a purpose".
That makes it scary. The unknowing of whether you'll be sentient for as long as the creature within needs the egg to protect it. Could you be in agony for months, years, decades, centuries? Perhaps more?
If nothing else, you know you'll slowly become a mental vegetable, aware only to the sensation of tormenting pain, as you're gradually turned into embryonic yolk. Knowing that the thing growing inside you has only one purpose. To hatch out from you and infect someone else. Your suffering can only be brought to an end by the sacrifice of another.
That doesn't make them insects. In fact, it totally divorces them from that analogy.
It was also why '
The Thing' is still able to impress.
By comparison, although obviously unpleasant, the Predalien's method won't be able to touch upon the same psychosexual territory, although it'll come close to the facehugger's, obviously.
QuoteWhy wasn't egg morphing good enough for you?
This is precisely what I want to know. Time constraints can be worked around and easily so. I even gave an example of how to do that. The directors already confirmed they were able to get alterations to the story done.
Quote from: Colin_Strause on Oct 26, 2007, 09:18:06 PM
Oh well, this has been fun but it's time to get back to work.
Peace
Thanks for coming here to interact and defend your own vision, regardless of how many of us feel about it. As you can see, I'm interested to see this on the screen. I just lament that it won't be the egg transformation so many of us had wanted to be there.
Quote from: Johnny Handsome on Oct 26, 2007, 09:40:24 PM
Quote from: Scree on Oct 26, 2007, 09:37:18 PM
Quote from: Master on Oct 26, 2007, 09:30:40 PM
Quote from: Major Alan Schaefer on Oct 26, 2007, 09:29:03 PM
Who said the Predalien wasen't a Queen from the beganing?
Chestburster who had no arms nor crest.
Like the Queen they removed from Ripley at the beginning of Alien Resurrection?
Very good point there, so the predalien could be a queen from the start.
The rez queen looked like a normal chestburster too.
Because it was massively under-developed. Human babies don't look much like humans, either, if they're early enough. It did, however, have the beginnings of a crest and the mouth had a protective sheath, which this does not.
The one it should be compared with is what we saw in '
Alien 3', which had a specific aesthetic.
Quote from: dDave on Oct 26, 2007, 09:46:32 PM
we know that the pred-women were stronger then males
We don't even know if female Predators exist or what the gender was of the ones we saw in the various films.
Back to the theory again, this is contradicting stuff.
Theory 1:Aliens transform victims into eggs. One or all have embryonic Queen facehuggers within them. Regular adults can be created through the, uh, 'oral' concept.
Conclusion:Wrong. We now know this is a moulting Queen (which contradicts another interview, but there we are).
Theory 2:Aliens moult into Queens. They can breed orally.
Conclusion:This contradicts natural Queens. If any adult can transform, what's the point of birthing natural Queens? Any adult could simply move away from the nest and be one.
Theory 3:Aiens moult into Queens. They can breed orally. They can transform victims into eggs. Both will create regular adults.
Conclusion:What's the points of egg transformation? Oral would be the quickest method. It means the creature in '
Alien' was being completely illogical.
See where we are? If the Predalien can moult, then it renders natural Queens obselete. If they can breed orally or through egg alteration, then why bother with egging?
I just don't see a way to make this fit with what we've seen in the other films. That doesn't mean this one won't be
entertaining, but this is leaving me with little alternative but to conclude this series as not being canon.
Which annoys me, because I've been trying damn hard to want this to all somehow fit together.
The bitch of it is, this could have actually fitted together, were it not for the Predalien having to grow and be a Queen. The only hope seems to be that we might not actually see that and it's just the directors' personal theory for what's 'really' going on.
We could say that maybe they egg people early on, only able to do the oral thing after a certain time, but I don't know why that would be.