Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Aug 06, 2015, 02:56:25 PM
Why do you have to be like this? Why can't I have a ship?
I was kidding, jeeze!
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Aug 06, 2015, 07:19:39 AM
In that case definitely. I like my lethal hunters. If the general feeling of the Predators invokes a sense of Turnabout or SCS I'd be a very very happy reader.
Keep them as Hunters. Not slavers, not conquerors either. Keep them what the first two films established them to be. Simple, and too the point. Nothing more, nothing less. I think we can agree on that.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Aug 06, 2015, 07:19:39 AM
That would definitely seem to be the way of it. I'm quite happy personally. I hate getting into their heads.
The reason why I say I am happy and disappointed is because I am happy that he is not using the Yautja concept incase he does something with the Predators and don't agree with. Therefore, I wouldn't have to count and accept it with things associated with the Yautja. That's incase he screws up... the reason why I am disappointed is if he does something awesome with the Predators, that I happen to agree with, then well.. yeah. It's not the Yautja doing the awesome stuff, just.. something else.
I have a very black and white view when it comes to the presentation of the Predators.
Do I like getting into their heads? Well... it depends on who writes them. Obviously I favor the Perry's version of them and they are what had resonated with me the most. They were portrayed as harsh anti-heroes.. though that should be said for a select few in the novels. I haven't read South China Sea but I heard the flashbacks for the Predator were cool...
I've read some novels where we don't see the perspective of the Predators like Big Game, Concrete Jungle and Cold War. I thought those were pretty damn cool.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Aug 06, 2015, 02:56:25 PM
You have the Yautja and the Hish because Shirley didn't know about the Yautja.
I remember hearing that he was told to ignore what came before. Either way.. we've got two.