Quote from: SM on Jan 14, 2018, 07:24:07 PM
Quote from: tleilaxu on Jan 14, 2018, 02:40:35 PM
It's actually pretty funny how people sperg out when you criticize Alien and Aliens even with just a fraction of the same nitpicking level that people criticize Covenant with. Of course the old movies are literally flawless and perfect right? Like when Dallas, the captain of the ship, insists on having a crew-member infected with an alien life-form that could potentially kill them all brought into the ship it is NOT stupid, it's "a human and rational decision taken by a man wanting to save his friend" or something
Who argues that Dallas wasn't mistaken to do that?
Please read Paranoid Android's comment above yours.
It pretty much supports tleilaxu's argument.
Beyond that, I don't think that Dallas' decision is the most irrational one in "Alien".
- That belongs to Ash, even with the special order.
* Ash allowing Kane (with a fast growing 1 foot [1/3 meter] parasite inside him) to eat with the crew was absurd;
1. In terms of controlling the spread of the infection;
2. To reduce the danger to the crew where (who are flying the ship);
3. Getting the ship to earth which is improved by keeping the crew alive;
4. Maximize the chances in getting the creature back to earth which was the main purpose of SO 937.
I have film theories about Ash's xenomorph worship which justifies what he does.
- But in terms of the behavior of an Alien movie science officer imo, it is probably the most irrational decision by such a character in the franchise.
** Now is "Alien" a great science fiction film? Yes. It's #10 on my all time SF list.
But I keep in mind (and several people I've discussed this with have sometimes admitted), the creature needed to get loose in order for the movie to work.
For the purposes of the story, Ash needed to let Kane eat with the crew to have the iconic chestburster scene. (And not put Kane immediately into stasis to prevent this.)
I accept that this is what was needed for this kind of story.