Quote from: SiL on Jan 07, 2024, 01:14:56 AMQuote from: Acid_Reign161 on Jan 07, 2024, 01:11:00 AMSure, if you consider any of the creatures in 'Covenant' to be a true Xenomorph (they arent)
Film doesn't say this.
Quoteand ignore the mural in 'Prometheus' which showed facehuggers existed prior.
Mural doesn't show facehuggers, and the movie shows that face-hugging things are made with goo.
Well, the movie doesn't say it *is* a Xenomorph either 😅 let's look at what the movies do show us (with some personal interpretation);
Neither 'Alien' nor 'Aliens' showed a Xenomorph hatching from a human host fully formed, translucent or with all limbs. Likewise, the adults didn't have a fleshy exterior, and elongated arms. Neither did they have a gestation period of minutes.
The derelict in 'Alien' was ancient. Even if Dallas made an unqualified assumption and was incorrect that the Jockey was fossilised, 'Prometheus' showed that Engineer helmets in similar state on LV-233 were at least a couple of thousand years old (carbon dated) meaning the eggs predate David.
The mural does indeed show 'some' face hugging creature comes from the goo as you say; it also shows a very Xenomorph-esque creature front and centre. However the pathogen in the vases when unleashed as the weapon intended *doesnt* produce face-hugging creatures. Since the image doesn't show what the vases *do*, it could be implied that it shows where the goo came *from*
When the translucent burster hatches, David holds out his arms for it to mimic - not unlike the pose of the creature in the mural he saw on LV-233 - and smiles triumphantly; perhaps due to successfully creating the perfection he saw in the mural.
There's definitely room for interpretation within the movie.