Quote from: [cancerblack] on Sep 30, 2021, 10:50:51 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 30, 2021, 03:12:13 AM
When a belief can damage the physical and mental integrity of other people, governments must intervene. The free speech is so overrated, and it carries great risk. I don't see the world in black and white, and I think that sometimes limits are necessary.
This is complete bullshit, but (bizarrely) I'm going to echo Huggs and say it's your right to be 200% wrong.
Note that in light of recent events on this very forum, I'll point out that this is a private dictatorship, not a free nation.
It is not so different from a state allowing parents to prevent minors from receiving blood transfusions for medical reasons due to religious beliefs, as in the case of Jehovah's Witnesses. The purpose of the state is to protect its citizens, especially minors. Sing any belief you want, the moment your beliefs endanger the lives of others it is already a crime.
Tolerance without limits can be exploited in their favor by intolerant social movements such as pro racism / homophobic ideologies. Unlimited free speech from dangerous ideologies is not a harmless game. Your words are like the fallacy of equality.
Or maybe I see some ideologies similar to how you see pitbull. But the strangest thing is that you act as if the only thing that matters is that a group of dangerously irrational people use communication channels to spread disinformation to the masses, during a pandemic that has killed millions! This is not another day on the third planet of the solar system, and the anti-vaccination groups are not a harmless joke like the flat Earthers. Especially taking into account the contingency we're living now.
Having said that, I am 200% disagree with you.