Quote from: The Eighth Passenger on Jul 24, 2015, 03:33:27 PMThat's very true! :-)
3D cuts into the films budget as well. Typically costs about $15 million extra on top of everything else.
That money could be far better spent on stuff like better sets, writers, actors, cgi etc...
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jul 23, 2015, 06:41:21 PMThose are the two movies I'd say used it well too. In fact, those two are two of the three movies I actually made it a point to see in 3D. The third was Edge of Tomorrow, which was only good because it used 3D well. In 2D, I'd say it was a mediocre sci-fi with an intresting approach to storytelling. Lol. Ok, now I'm diverging...
https://twitter.com/NeillBlomkamp/status/624277691454373888
Mentions 'Avatar' and 'Prometheus' as examples of where it can be done well - which I'd agree with.
Quotek, i officially cannot stand 3d. hate it. VR, absolutely love, AR, interesting. 3d films, cant stand.