Quote from: TizerisT on May 04, 2017, 05:37:21 AM
I agree. Too many movies contain blood / guns / gore just for the sake of it. You don't need these things to tell a good story whether the genre is action, horror, whatever.
In fact most of the time it just lowers the movie artistically for me.
But to leave gore out of a film intentionally doesn't necessarily elevate it, either.
In regards to Aliens, yeah, you only have two instances of human blood. But you have Ripley's nightmare, with the stretching skin (always gross), a man being burned alive, a guy's face being melted off with acid (much tamer when compared, oddly enough, to the face-melting scenes from Raiders or The Fly 2) and plenty of Android blood when Bishop is killed. Suddenly when we're dealing with "blood" that isn't red, or human, then it's not gross to us? Funny how that works, but it is a form of censorship (think: green blood pixels for the sprites in the T-for-teen versions of DOOM, on the GBA). Still blood, but not human, and not reminiscent of human, so, less offensive, or taboo, or gross. It's white paint, or milk, not blood.
Yet, it doesn't stop Bishop's "death" scene from being totally awesome. Great sound effects, and android gore. Probably my favorite "death" in the series, except Bishop, well, doesn't actually die. Perhaps that's another reason why it's not as vulgar to some? He can't feel pain like we do? It's not a sadistic scene, in that sense?
And then you have the garbage bags filled with maple syrup that constitute the Queen's eggsac, which Ripley pumps full of grenades. Aliens might not be the bloodiest film in the franchise, but it's full of slime, milk, and other fluids. Perhaps it shows some restraint in retrospect considering how runny the slime is on later xenomorph designs, but at the time, when Aliens was new, did it feel like they were using restraint, holding back--or was it meant to actually be what Hudson, in the film, calls "an express elevator ride to hell"?
Also, in the 2004 commentary on Aliens, Cameron boasted that his version of the chestburster was nastier than Scott's. Hell, you can see it push through the colonist's ribs on its way out of her body. Pretty gnarly.
But you guys have a point, in that many deaths in the film occur off screen. Spunkmeijer, Wierzbowski, Hudson, Burke, most of the colonists, Drake, Deidreitch, Apone, Timmy, Newt's parents-- they all die offscreen. Furthermore, Newt is grabbed, offscreen, when she's in the water. Burke sabotages Ripley offscreen. The colony is destroyed offscreen. It's a good balance of showing us, and letting us imagine.
And it doesn't change the fact that the film is very gory and messy compared to many films that would excise the gore entirely to elevate themselves. It proves handily that a gory film can be a great one.
Quote from: MrH on May 04, 2017, 06:45:26 AM
Will be in attendance at the world premiere tonight, however, embargo doesn't lift for a few days.
I have high hopes for this movie though and am eagerly awaiting being able to review it
Can you tell us if you dug it, with a smiley face, if you did?