Quote from: frasermaxx on Oct 28, 2022, 08:58:07 AMPredator 1987 had a close up of the predator tending to his wounds on the tree and it looked bloody good even to this day, no CGI whatsoever. Don't understand why the creative team sculpted thick stubby fingers only to be CGI enhanced later on.
It looks great in 87 until I see the fingernails bend, squish and warp into new shapes when Jungle Hunter is fixing himself up. Can't ever unsee that stuff. Otherwise, it's not noticed until pointed out for most people.
.35 & when he makes a fist you see those nails move unnaturally, and .40 too.
I can give Prey some slack because the first film dealt with it. Yes, it was 35 years ago, and the designs didn't change mid movie in 87. Just to me, these things don't ruin or take away from the experience.
I just took it as stunt gloves that maybe needed to swap in for the original because of being damaged or something of the sort where they couldn't get what they should have had or what they'd wanted. Coulda reshot it too, but maybe it was caught too late. Or maybe it wasn't any of this at all, and something we aren't aware of. I like to think it's something that wasn't caught in time to fix.